2000
DOI: 10.1007/s004930070038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NOTE Spectral Characterization of Tree-Width-Two Graphs

Abstract: In his recent preprint "Multiplicities of eigenvalues and tree-width of graphs," Colin de Verdière introduced a new spectral invariant (denoted here by (G)) of a graph G, similar in spirit to his now-classical invariant µ(G). He showed that (G) is minor-monotone and is related to the tree-width la(G) of G: (G) ≤ la(G) and, moreover, (G) ≤ 1 ⇔ la (G) = 1, i.e. G is a forest. We show that (G) = 2 ⇔ la (G) = 2 and give the corresponding forbidden-minor and ear-decomposition characterizations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was proved by Van der Holst [96] and Kotlov [117] for a(G) ≤ 2, but the following example of Kotlov shows that it is false in general.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This was proved by Van der Holst [96] and Kotlov [117] for a(G) ≤ 2, but the following example of Kotlov shows that it is false in general.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In Example A.11, the difference between ⌊M⌋(G) and ξ(G) occurs for very low values of these parameters, where we were able to use the characterization in [26] of all graphs having M(G) ≤ 2. Since the forbidden minors for ⌊Z + ⌋(G) = la(G) ≤ 2, namely K 4 and T 3 , are the same as the forbidden minors for ν(G) ≤ 2 [27], it follows that if ⌊M + ⌋(G) > ν(G), then ν(G) ≥ 3, and quite possibly much larger. Notice that Example A.20, which shows a difference between ⌊Z + ⌋ and ⌊M + ⌋, has ⌊M + ⌋(H) = 10, whereas the pentasun has ⌊Z⌋(H 5 ) > ⌊M⌋(H 5 ) = 2.…”
Section: Corollary 257 For Any Graph G Ccr-tw(g) = Tw(g)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this notation we are looking for two matrices 3 ) by Lemma 2.4 it follows that fib(x) is a face of E 6 and by (13) we have that X ∈ ext E 6 . Then (17) implies that dim U ii : i ∈ [6] = 6 and thus dim U 1 = dim U 2 = 3. This implies that U 1 ∩ U 2 = {0} and thus…”
Section: Two Special Graphs: K 33 and Kmentioning
confidence: 99%