2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00039.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes for a Critical Personality Psychology: Making Room under the Critical Psychology Umbrella

Abstract: Inspired by the liberation psychologist Martin-Baró who provocatively defined personality as that of which individuals can be robbed in conditions of social injustice and research psychologists in training whose appreciation of the possibilities of personality psychology has been limited by the dominance of trait approaches, this paper claims that we need and can practice a critical personality psychology. Conceptual and methodological tools for such an enterprise are identified in two arenas of current resear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If key scholars in the social sciences are resistant to the value of qualitative and narrative paradigms as legitimate forms of social scientific inquiry, it will be all the more difficult to establish the relevance of narrative evidence in policy areas. As Ouellette (2008) has previously highlighted, psychology has a rich history of narrative research, which is central to key discoveries in personality and emotion research and cognitive sciences, to name just a few areas. Current efforts within the field aimed toward aligning psychology with the "hard" sciences have resulted in some loss of this important history and marginalization of narrative research within the discipline.…”
Section: Redefining What Counts As Research Evidence In the Policy Arenamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If key scholars in the social sciences are resistant to the value of qualitative and narrative paradigms as legitimate forms of social scientific inquiry, it will be all the more difficult to establish the relevance of narrative evidence in policy areas. As Ouellette (2008) has previously highlighted, psychology has a rich history of narrative research, which is central to key discoveries in personality and emotion research and cognitive sciences, to name just a few areas. Current efforts within the field aimed toward aligning psychology with the "hard" sciences have resulted in some loss of this important history and marginalization of narrative research within the discipline.…”
Section: Redefining What Counts As Research Evidence In the Policy Arenamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Current efforts within the field aimed toward aligning psychology with the "hard" sciences have resulted in some loss of this important history and marginalization of narrative research within the discipline. Ouellette (2008) notes that psychologists must revisit these important historical connections between narrative research and more mainstream psychological research in order to create more space for research on narratives-in-context within psychology. Here, we wish to reiterate this call to "recast" the history of psychology as inclusive of key early narrative contributions, which we contend will result in an expanded audience for narrative research within policy arenas as well.…”
Section: Redefining What Counts As Research Evidence In the Policy Arenamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations