1964
DOI: 10.1017/s2040618500035036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on two lemmas concerning the Epstein zeta-function

Abstract: 1. We use Cassels's notation and define h (m, n), Q (m, n), Zh (s), Zh (1) – ZQ (1) and G (x, y) as in [1]. Rankin [5] proved that the Epstein zeta-function Zh (s) satisfies, for s ≧ 1·035, theTHEOREM. For s > 0, Zh (s) — ZQ (s) ≧ 0 with equality if and only ifh is equivalent to Q. Rankin then asked whether the theorem is true for all s > 1. Cassels [1] answered this question in the affirmative and proved further that the theorem is true for all s > 0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Right: the relative difference ζ2(I2, s) − ζ2(S hex , s) / |ζ2(S hex , s)|. It shows that the hexagonal lattice energy is lower than that of the square lattice for all s > 0, as it is proved in [198,48,79,65]. Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Right: the relative difference ζ2(I2, s) − ζ2(S hex , s) / |ζ2(S hex , s)|. It shows that the hexagonal lattice energy is lower than that of the square lattice for all s > 0, as it is proved in [198,48,79,65]. Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In dimension d = 2, it has been proved by Rankin [198], Cassels [48], Ennola [79] and Diananda [65], that the hexagonal lattice is the unique minimizer of the zeta function, for any s > 0, when the density is fixed. In other words, we have…”
Section: Optimal Lattices and Special Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dimension 2, W was shown to be minimized within the class of lattices of covolume 1 by the triangular lattice in [SS1], respectively [PS], by showing that this question could be reduced to the question of minimizing the Epstein zeta function, previously solved in [Cas,Ran,Enno1,Enno2,Dia,Mont] (see also [Ch, SaSt, OSP] for general dimension). In [SS1] it was conjectured, in view of the observations of triangular Abrikosov lattices of vortices in superconductors (and in line with the Cohn-Kumar conjecture) that the triangular lattice should minimize W in the 2D logarithmic case, among the class of all configurations of density 1.…”
Section: Coulomb and Riesz Interactions: Definitions And Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question is in fact of number-theoretic nature: in [69] it is shown that the question in dimension 2 reduces to minimizing P p2ƒ jpj s , the Epstein zeta function, with s > 2 among lattices ƒ, a question that was in turn already solved in dimension 2 in the 1960s (see [17,22,26,27,60] and also [54] and references therein), but the same question is open in dimension d 3-except for d D 8 and d D 24-and it is only conjectured that the FCC is a local minimizer; see [71] and references therein. The connection with the minimization of W among lattices and that of the Epstein zeta functions is not even rigorously clear in dimension d 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%