“…In this section, we subjectively and objectively compare the effectiveness of the proposed method with those of the other photographic reproduction methods to confirm whether it affords more advantages than these methods. We selected seven classical and state-of-the-art methods for our experiments, including the following global-based reproduction method: Reinhard et al [4] (published in 2005); the following three local-based reproduction methods: Ahn et al [9] (published in 2013), Li et al [13] (published in 2018), and Gao et al [25] (published in 2020); and the following three decomposition-based reproduction methods: Gu et al [14] (published in 2013), Liang et al [17] (published in 2018), and Miao et al [18] (published in 2019). For a comparison of the computational complexity, taking the image memorial (with size of 768 × 512) as an example, the processing time needed to generate a reproduced image is 0.252 s (in [4]), 0.533 s (in [9]), 5.301 s (in [13]), 0.627 s (in [25]), 0.788 s (in [14]), 2.189 s (in [17]), 0.733 s (in [18]), and 2.201 s (in the proposed method).…”