Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Part 1 - AAMAS '02 2002
DOI: 10.1145/544805.544807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notions of reputation in multi-agents systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agents can build models which identify malicious entities based on direct interaction with those entities; numerous algorithms exist for maintaining trust models based on direct interaction [23]. For example, Jonker and Treur propose both qualitative and quantitative trust metrics, which credit an agent's reputation when it produces a positive outcome, and discredit the agent's reputation when a negative outcome is produced [14].…”
Section: Trust In Agent Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Agents can build models which identify malicious entities based on direct interaction with those entities; numerous algorithms exist for maintaining trust models based on direct interaction [23]. For example, Jonker and Treur propose both qualitative and quantitative trust metrics, which credit an agent's reputation when it produces a positive outcome, and discredit the agent's reputation when a negative outcome is produced [14].…”
Section: Trust In Agent Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are often more robust and easier to build because information can be sent to other agents even if the attacked agent is in the process of being killed. In recommendation based reputation building, the trusting agent forms a trust model of the host by asking other agents in the system about their interactions with the host [23,33]. This method allows the trusting agent to form a reputation of the trustee without being exposed to the risk of direct cooperative interaction.…”
Section: Trust In Agent Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows parties to gauge trust of reciprocation without previous interaction but there is potential for malicious or mis-leading reporting. This is particularly a problem for e-commerce systems and surveys relating to this are given in [5,18]. Note that ensuring accurate reporting of reputation naturally incentivizes node cooperation: if nodes in a system are associated with low cooperation levels they are not attractive for interaction with other nodes and therefore bad behaviour implies isolation from the system.…”
Section: Enforcement and Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mui et al [12][13][14] define trust as "a subjective belief an agent has about another's future behaviour based on history of their encounters". This definition of trust by Mui et al is widely used in the literature by various researchers.…”
Section: Definitions Of Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mui et al [12][13][14] define reputation as "a perception that an agent creates through past actions about its intentions and norms". This definition is similar to the definition of reputation by Abdul Rahman et al, in that it states that the reputation of an entity A is a perception or expectation held about it by other entity (ies), which is computed based on its past actions.…”
Section: Definitions Of Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%