2018
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2018.2800281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NOTSA: Novel OBU With Three-Level Security Architecture for Internet of Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [19], the paper talks about the novel onboard units with three-level security architecture (NOTSA). There are different types of attacks that affect the CAN (controller area network) like: -Short-range attack: attacker becomes a part of the network -Long-range attack: attacker tracks the movement by attacking the navigation and radio function devices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], the paper talks about the novel onboard units with three-level security architecture (NOTSA). There are different types of attacks that affect the CAN (controller area network) like: -Short-range attack: attacker becomes a part of the network -Long-range attack: attacker tracks the movement by attacking the navigation and radio function devices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are multi-level security strategies in the proposed method based on the application of FlexRay data signals. Multilevel security protocols were also adopted in [21]. Wang et al noted that adding security mechanisms can protect the IVN by collaborating with current in-vehicle security schemes.…”
Section: Design Of the Secure Data Transmission Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make our protocol more advantageous, we compared the average time delays of authentication at different clock rates (400, 300, 200, 168, 150, and 120 MHz) with the average time delays of NOTSA's authentication [23] and POSTER's authentication [36]. Compared with…”
Section: Simulation Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%