2006
DOI: 10.1097/icu.0b013e3280108544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NovaVision: vision restoration therapy

Abstract: In clinical practice NovaVision's therapy should not currently gain acceptance in view of unacceptable perimetric standards and equivocal results. Possible effects on a relative scotoma at the edge of a lesion have not been adequately explored. In the interim, research should also be focused on compensatory eye movement strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, convincing evidence is still lacking that visual stimulation of the blind hemifield leads to restitution of the occipital cortex in a clinically relevant way. 5,6,13,27,29,30 Because in both groups disease duration exceeded 6 months while dissociations in post-training performance occurred in the EST group compared with the FT group, spontaneous recovery is unlikely to account for the present findings. The groups were uniform and did not differ with respect to essential patient characteristics.…”
Section: Figure 4 Fixational Eye Movementsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Therefore, convincing evidence is still lacking that visual stimulation of the blind hemifield leads to restitution of the occipital cortex in a clinically relevant way. 5,6,13,27,29,30 Because in both groups disease duration exceeded 6 months while dissociations in post-training performance occurred in the EST group compared with the FT group, spontaneous recovery is unlikely to account for the present findings. The groups were uniform and did not differ with respect to essential patient characteristics.…”
Section: Figure 4 Fixational Eye Movementsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The arguments over the effectiveness of and mechanisms behind these apparent visual field improvements have been rehearsed elsewhere and largely centre on whether gains at the border of damaged vision are due to 'Activat[ion of] surviving neurons in areas of residual vision.' [32], or are instead the result of undetected eye movements into the blindfield [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. One important thread in the discussions is that in the initial VRT experiments, visual field improvement was measured using the same machine that delivered the therapy [31,34]; a potential bias that some more recent studies appear not to have heeded [30].…”
Section: Visual Field Restitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 This method involves the stimulation of the 'borderzone' or 'transition zone' between the area of visual loss and the intact area of vision. 11 The efficacy of these approaches is inconclusive mainly due to a lack of larger scale randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%