2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2018.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel approach for accurate minute DNA quantification on microvolumetric solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In P1, the initial DNA mass was obtained from quantification of the BB1 + λDNA (1:1) solution used for binding. For the remaining protocols (P2, P2.1, and P3), the initial DNA amount was estimated from the P1 results since the binding solution used in these protocolsBB2contains chaotropic salts that have previously shown to interfere with DNA quantification . Results are presented as mean ± 90% confidence interval (CI), n = 3 independent replicates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In P1, the initial DNA mass was obtained from quantification of the BB1 + λDNA (1:1) solution used for binding. For the remaining protocols (P2, P2.1, and P3), the initial DNA amount was estimated from the P1 results since the binding solution used in these protocolsBB2contains chaotropic salts that have previously shown to interfere with DNA quantification . Results are presented as mean ± 90% confidence interval (CI), n = 3 independent replicates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard curves required for DNA quantification were obtained using NanoDrop 3300 software and compared for both DNA types. Regarding the salmon sperm DNA, the three mathematical models described in the related research article [1] (least squares, weighted least squares and weighted ridge regressions) were implemented, being these curves compared with the one obtained using NanoDrop 3300 software. In order to evaluate the precision of these mathematical models under varied conditions, in terms of repeatability, a total of 10 assays were performed and the relative standard deviation (% RSD) was calculated as an indication of precision regarding variations from assay to assay.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the use of microfluidic devices and nanoparticles is already improving DNA recovery and extraction processes from complex food matrices. 112,113 Besides advances in technologies and instrumentation, issues of method development, validation, and harmonization have to be addressed in terms of assuring the validity of future studies prior to the implementation of the developed methods in the industry: (i) all of the possible sources of variability, such as changes caused by intraspecies differences or food processing, need to be controlled; (ii) power analysis should be performed to check statistical validity of the results; (iii) interlaboratory comparisons should be addressed in order to guarantee that comparable analytical results are provided; and (iv) certified reference materials and operation procedures should be developed and made available for method standardization.…”
Section: ■ Lampmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because food samples frequently contain fragmented DNA and minute concentrations, new sample-preparation protocols able to deal with these trace-level DNA amounts will also be needed. In this sense, the use of microfluidic devices and nanoparticles is already improving DNA recovery and extraction processes from complex food matrices. , …”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%