1996
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v87.6.2605a.bloodjournal8762605a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcripts or reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction artifacts? [letter; comment]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amplification of MYH11 intronic sequences in the present study could be explained similarly. Other PCR artifacts due to aspecific annealing of MYH11 M1 primer to another positionof MYH11 cDNA were also reported[20]. We have shown here that the nested RT-PCR method described by van der Reijden et al[15] using cd-mm and cmd1-mmd2 primer sets could also amplify PCR artifacts such as CBFβ cDNA and MYH11 genomic DNA, resulting in false positive results.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…Amplification of MYH11 intronic sequences in the present study could be explained similarly. Other PCR artifacts due to aspecific annealing of MYH11 M1 primer to another positionof MYH11 cDNA were also reported[20]. We have shown here that the nested RT-PCR method described by van der Reijden et al[15] using cd-mm and cmd1-mmd2 primer sets could also amplify PCR artifacts such as CBFβ cDNA and MYH11 genomic DNA, resulting in false positive results.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%