“…The expectations of cost and effective electrocatalytic materials for the HER are also growing, such as excellent conductivity and highly efficient and large catalytic areas . Among all transition-metal compounds, transition-metal sulfides (TMSs), divided into two-distinct classes (layered MS 2 and nonlayered M x S y , M = transition metals), which possess the advantages in low-cost, abundant reserves, and sustainability, are thus regarded as promising substitutes for noble metal catalysts (e.g., Pt and Pd). , Additionally, different TMSs can emerge as different catalytic active sites: the S–M–S sites located on the edge of the MS 2 structure mainly present outstanding in-plane electrical conductivity; ,, some undercoordinated surface cations and the ligands (S adsorbing H atoms to form S–H bands) of M x S y are regarded as the excellent catalytic active sites for the HER. , However, the catalytic performances of TMS are still enormously hindered by the following factors: inert catalytic active sites of the basal plane-MS 2 , , low loading amounts of active centers (M) in M x S y , and serious aggregation during the reactions of M x S y . Addressing the issues, various strategies have been developed, including heteroatomic dropping, heterojunction constructing, , and defective introducing .…”