2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.146232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel duplication remnant in the first complete mitogenome of Hemitriakis japanica and the unique phylogenetic position of family Triakidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinctive morphology of C. oxyrhynchus does not exclude this species from the genus Carcharhinus, however, given that the tree topology and genetic distances found in the present study emphatically support the inclusion of this species in Carcharhinus. The results are also consistent with previous findings of the paraphyletic arrangement of Carcharhinus considering C. glaucus [4,10,30,31,34,37,40,41,72], but this is the first time that it is recognized as a new combination and all fossil taxa in Prionace (Prionace antiquus (Agassiz, 1856), Prionace egertoni (Agassiz, 1843), and Prionace tenuis (Agassiz, 1843)) should also be reallocated to Carcharhinus or recognized as new combinations. The relatively large dataset employed in the present study, together with the robust phylogenetic approaches applied in the analyses, supports this conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The distinctive morphology of C. oxyrhynchus does not exclude this species from the genus Carcharhinus, however, given that the tree topology and genetic distances found in the present study emphatically support the inclusion of this species in Carcharhinus. The results are also consistent with previous findings of the paraphyletic arrangement of Carcharhinus considering C. glaucus [4,10,30,31,34,37,40,41,72], but this is the first time that it is recognized as a new combination and all fossil taxa in Prionace (Prionace antiquus (Agassiz, 1856), Prionace egertoni (Agassiz, 1843), and Prionace tenuis (Agassiz, 1843)) should also be reallocated to Carcharhinus or recognized as new combinations. The relatively large dataset employed in the present study, together with the robust phylogenetic approaches applied in the analyses, supports this conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Naylor [75] argued that the morphological similarities found between the species of each group must be the result of convergent evolution and that there is a need for further studies of the phylogenetic structure of Carcharhinus. Future reclassifications based on these subdivisions are possible considering, but even with the full mitogenome datasets of Kousteni et al [40] and Wang et al [41], these arrangements are currently uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Between trnE and trnF , the secondary structure of the sequence could be predicted. The large non-coding region in trnE-trnF was considered DmTTF and had a similar structure to that of other insect species ( Roberti et al, 2003 ; Beckenbach, 2012 ; Yuan et al, 2016 ; Wang et al, 2022a ). Other insect groups also had the trnE-trnF IGR and other structural features consistent with repeat regions ( Wu et al, 2012 ; Zhang et al, 2014 ; Chen et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%