2009
DOI: 10.2514/1.38210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Expressions of Equations of Relative Motion and Control in Keplerian Orbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark While the derivation and form of show the expression similar to those in the works of Yoon et al the definition of LOS coordinate frame associated with ECQ coordinate frame is different and the origin is located on the chaser, thus the expression of gravity difference term normalΔgl is different and corresponding relative motion equation look similar but in fact differ in detail. Moreover, the computation of spherical coordinates bold-italicq=[]ρ,β,εT does not need the orbit state of target and can be measured directly via the suite of onboard sensor, thus the LOS‐based relative motion model has the advantages that it can be applied to the noncooperative target, even the maneuvering target.…”
Section: Spacecraft Dynamics and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark While the derivation and form of show the expression similar to those in the works of Yoon et al the definition of LOS coordinate frame associated with ECQ coordinate frame is different and the origin is located on the chaser, thus the expression of gravity difference term normalΔgl is different and corresponding relative motion equation look similar but in fact differ in detail. Moreover, the computation of spherical coordinates bold-italicq=[]ρ,β,εT does not need the orbit state of target and can be measured directly via the suite of onboard sensor, thus the LOS‐based relative motion model has the advantages that it can be applied to the noncooperative target, even the maneuvering target.…”
Section: Spacecraft Dynamics and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Remark Although some research works have been done based on the primary form of LOS‐based relative motion model, the system does not satisfy the physical property . With the transformation matrix bold-italicB()q, the transformed system satisfies the physical property , which can be viewed as a matrix expression of energy conservation and is very useful for the design of control law …”
Section: Spacecraft Dynamics and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, more accurate models, usually nonlinear, are necessary. Different nonlinear techniques have been applied to control the relative motion, such as adaptive control [3], sliding mode [4] and computed-torque [5]. However, these solutions do not satisfy any optimality condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the cross-track motion is a simple undamped oscillatory motion that is decoupled from the rest of the system, pure derivative control can be applied on this axis to provide adequate damping [41]. Equivalently, the cross-track position weighting can be set to zero in Eq.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of docking maneuvers have been simulated using the nonlinear formation flying model (41)(42)(43)(44), which includes the PPT model, in combination with the observation model in Fig. 2 and the LMPC control law.…”
Section: B Docking Maneuver Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%