2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04.
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2004.1421342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel frame interpolation method for hold-type displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above equation states that if the layer label at a transformed location or is different than the layer label at the source location , then the intensity at the transformed location should not be taken into account, since the layer is occluded at that point. For all the remaining cases that are not covered by (8), only the intensity that is closer to the average intensity , in the neighborhood of the interpolation frame location , is used as follows:…”
Section: Generating the Interpolation Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above equation states that if the layer label at a transformed location or is different than the layer label at the source location , then the intensity at the transformed location should not be taken into account, since the layer is occluded at that point. For all the remaining cases that are not covered by (8), only the intensity that is closer to the average intensity , in the neighborhood of the interpolation frame location , is used as follows:…”
Section: Generating the Interpolation Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifying the display properties by flashing the LCD backlight such that the image is formed more like a CRT [5,6] is effective in reducing motion blur but introduces additional artifacts such as contrast reduction, flickering, and luminance reduction [7]. Frame rate doubling for motion blur reduction has been achieved through a number of different approaches including variations of black frame insertion [8], gamma adjusted frame duplication [9], and motion compensated frame rate up conversion [10,11]. These approaches to increasing the frame rate reduce motion blur by shortening the hold time of the LCD, therefore making the target trajectory as expected by the human observer closer to that on the displayed image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this formulation l embodies the tradeoff between how far the output of the FB, UðzÞ, is from the original image and how far the final image, YðzÞ, is from the original. The reasoning behind Eq (8). is that if HðzÞ is normalized and TðzÞ is normalized, then the final output will maintain the same norm as the input image.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Straightforward amendments for LCD motion-blur reduce the constant-frame display duration by black-frame insertion [18] that causes unwanted eye strains, or by interpolationbased frame-rate up conversion [19]- [21] that is computationally intensive and unsuited for complicated motion types. More sophisticated techniques [22]- [24] counteract the LCD motion blur by a pre-display frame filtering, designed based on blur models of the LCD hold-type behavior and the eye-tracking capability of the human visual system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%