Novel glycine-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles entrapped calcium alginate beads for effective removal of lead

Removal of Cu(ii) from aqueous solution using Fe3O4–alginate modified biochar microspheres

“…34 The adsorption experiments were repeated by using the same MM. 0.1 g of metal-loaded MM was shaken in the desorbing agent (HNO 3 100 mL of 0.1 mol L À1 ) in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer at 160 rpm in a shaker for 120 min at room temperature.…”

An arginine functionalized magnetic nano-sorbent for simultaneous removal of three metal ions from water samples

“…[11][12][13][14] Therefore, a number of methods have been developed for the detection and removal of heavy metal ions from waste and drinking waters. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The traditional methods such as ion-exchange, chemical oxidation/reduction, chemical precipitation, ultra-ltration and reverse osmosis have several disadvantages such as high expense, prolonged period with less efficiency, production of other waste products, etc. 19 The adsorption method is still superior to other techniques because of its lowcost, simplicity of design, ease of operation, high effectiveness, reuse of the adsorbents along with their high adsorption capacity.…”

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The traditional methods such as ion-exchange, chemical oxidation/reduction, chemical precipitation, ultra-ltration and reverse osmosis have several disadvantages such as high expense, prolonged period with less efficiency, production of other waste products, etc. 19 The adsorption method is still superior to other techniques because of its lowcost, simplicity of design, ease of operation, high effectiveness, reuse of the adsorbents along with their high adsorption capacity. [2][3][4][5][12][13][14][15][16]19 However, recent bias has been shied to nanotechnology since nanoscale size, large surface area to volume ratio or efficiency, economic viability and environmental friendliness are all considered useful in the removal of heavy metal ions.…”

“…19 The adsorption method is still superior to other techniques because of its lowcost, simplicity of design, ease of operation, high effectiveness, reuse of the adsorbents along with their high adsorption capacity. [2][3][4][5][12][13][14][15][16]19 However, recent bias has been shied to nanotechnology since nanoscale size, large surface area to volume ratio or efficiency, economic viability and environmental friendliness are all considered useful in the removal of heavy metal ions. 12,19 Recently, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have received attention as adsorbent for the effective removal of metal ions because they can be easily separated by external magnetic eld aer the adsorption process is completed.…”

“…[2][3][4][5][12][13][14][15][16]19 However, recent bias has been shied to nanotechnology since nanoscale size, large surface area to volume ratio or efficiency, economic viability and environmental friendliness are all considered useful in the removal of heavy metal ions. 12,19 Recently, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have received attention as adsorbent for the effective removal of metal ions because they can be easily separated by external magnetic eld aer the adsorption process is completed. 17,19 However, bare MNPs are not applicable directly in adsorption process due to their strong dipole-dipole attraction between MNPs and high surface area may cause aggregation.…”