2005
DOI: 10.1021/ac048847r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Hydrophobicity Ruler Approach for Determining the Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients of Very Hydrophobic Compounds via Their Polymer/Solvent Solution Distribution Coefficients

Abstract: A novel hydrophobicity ruler approach for determining the octanol/water partition coefficients of very hydrophobic compounds is proposed, which is an indirect method that measures the polymer/solvent solution distribution coefficients (log Kp/s) of reference and unknown compounds. The log Kp/s values of the unknown compounds can be calibrated to their log Ko/w values via the correlation of the log Kp/s values of the reference compounds with their log Ko/w values. An organic solvent was used to increase the sol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the similar reasons, the smaller sized and less hydrophobic 6:2 H-PFESA was more accumulated in blood than its 8:2 counterpart. The relative hydrophobicity between Cl-PFESA and H-PFESAs was evaluated by their retention times on the C18 UPLC column, which were 7.15 min for 6:2 Cl-PFESA versus 6.44 min for 6:2 H-PFESA, and 7.73 min for 8:2 Cl-PFESA versus 7.09 min for 8:2 H-PFESA (Figure S1). The obtained results indicate that H-PFESAs are less hydrophobic than Cl-PFESAs, and 6:2 H-PFESA is less hydrophobic than 8:2 H-PFESA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the similar reasons, the smaller sized and less hydrophobic 6:2 H-PFESA was more accumulated in blood than its 8:2 counterpart. The relative hydrophobicity between Cl-PFESA and H-PFESAs was evaluated by their retention times on the C18 UPLC column, which were 7.15 min for 6:2 Cl-PFESA versus 6.44 min for 6:2 H-PFESA, and 7.73 min for 8:2 Cl-PFESA versus 7.09 min for 8:2 H-PFESA (Figure S1). The obtained results indicate that H-PFESAs are less hydrophobic than Cl-PFESAs, and 6:2 H-PFESA is less hydrophobic than 8:2 H-PFESA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 27 As non-planar PCB gave the highest intensity and has high hydrophobicity based on the number of chlorine atoms it is likely that PCB 206 will result in the greatest fluorescence increase as it has a log K ow 10.83. 27 For comparison, figure 4(d) demonstrates the interaction of BaP with humic acid (H.A), biphenyl (BiP) and 4, 4-Dihydroxy biphenyl (Di-OH BiP). BiP and Di-OH BiP molecules were selected due to their PCB like structure, hydrophobic nature and absence of chlorine atoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCBs are lipophilic compounds with high octanol–water partition coefficients ( K OW PCB‐126 = 6.94; Kong et al, 2005). Because PCBs are readily detected in sediments and biota and less so in dissolved and/or particulate aquatic phases (DeVault et al, 1996; Fisk et al, 1998), we used dietary exposure to better mimic the primary ecological exposure route.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%