2020
DOI: 10.1002/htj.21989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel insights into the computational techniques in unsteady MHD second‐grade fluid dynamics with oscillatory boundary conditions

Abstract: This study presents mechanisms for the investigation of an unsteady magnetohydrodynamic second‐grade fluid flow between two periodically oscillating plates. The flow characterization is given in three forms, that is, Couette flow, Poiseuille flow, and a combination flow of both of them. A mathematical system is generated to design the problems, which are solved in an analytical way with two novel procedures, namely Adomian decomposition method (ADM) and optimal homotopy asymptotic method (OHAM). The numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, unlike the other analytic approximation techniques, the HAM provides a simple way to ensure the convergence of the solution series. So, the analytical technique [39–41] is used to compute the solution of the transformed equations ()– (). Selecting the initial approximations and auxiliary linear operators for velocities, temperature, nanoparticles concentration and gyrotactic microorganisms concentration in the following form h0false(ζfalse)=0,f0false(ζfalse)=S1γ4(1+r1)iexpfalse(ζfalse),g0false(ζfalse)=1γ5(1+r1)iexpfalse(ζfalse),θ0false(ζfalse)=expfalse(ζfalse),ϕ0false(ζfalse)=NtNbexpfalse(ζfalse),χ0false(ζfalse)=expfalse(ζfalse),$$\begin{align} & h_{0}(\zeta ) = 0,\hspace{8.5359pt} {f_{0}}(\zeta ) = \frac{S_1}{\gamma _{4}(1+r_{1})^{i}}\exp (- \zeta ),\hspace{8.5359pt} g_{0}(\zeta ) = \frac{1}{\gamma _{5}(1+r_{1})^{i}}\exp (- \zeta ),\hspace{8.5359pt} \theta _{0}(\zeta ) = \exp (- \zeta ),\nonumber \\ &\phi _{0}(\zeta ) = -\frac{Nt}{Nb}\exp (- \zeta ),\hspace{8.5359pt}\chi _{0}(\zeta ) = \exp (- \zeta ), \end{align}$$ Lhbadbreak=h,14.22636ptLfgoodbreak=fgoodbreak−f,14.22636ptLggoodbreak=ggoodbreak−g,14.22636ptLθgoodbreak=θgoodbreak−θ,14.22636pt…”
Section: Non‐dimensional Equations Solution Via Hammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, unlike the other analytic approximation techniques, the HAM provides a simple way to ensure the convergence of the solution series. So, the analytical technique [39–41] is used to compute the solution of the transformed equations ()– (). Selecting the initial approximations and auxiliary linear operators for velocities, temperature, nanoparticles concentration and gyrotactic microorganisms concentration in the following form h0false(ζfalse)=0,f0false(ζfalse)=S1γ4(1+r1)iexpfalse(ζfalse),g0false(ζfalse)=1γ5(1+r1)iexpfalse(ζfalse),θ0false(ζfalse)=expfalse(ζfalse),ϕ0false(ζfalse)=NtNbexpfalse(ζfalse),χ0false(ζfalse)=expfalse(ζfalse),$$\begin{align} & h_{0}(\zeta ) = 0,\hspace{8.5359pt} {f_{0}}(\zeta ) = \frac{S_1}{\gamma _{4}(1+r_{1})^{i}}\exp (- \zeta ),\hspace{8.5359pt} g_{0}(\zeta ) = \frac{1}{\gamma _{5}(1+r_{1})^{i}}\exp (- \zeta ),\hspace{8.5359pt} \theta _{0}(\zeta ) = \exp (- \zeta ),\nonumber \\ &\phi _{0}(\zeta ) = -\frac{Nt}{Nb}\exp (- \zeta ),\hspace{8.5359pt}\chi _{0}(\zeta ) = \exp (- \zeta ), \end{align}$$ Lhbadbreak=h,14.22636ptLfgoodbreak=fgoodbreak−f,14.22636ptLggoodbreak=ggoodbreak−g,14.22636ptLθgoodbreak=θgoodbreak−θ,14.22636pt…”
Section: Non‐dimensional Equations Solution Via Hammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present problem is modeled for the curved surface under the effect of magnetic dipole in the presence of gyrotactic microorganisms and cubic autocatalysis chemical reactions in Walter-B fluid which is solved through the analytical method namely homotopy analysis method [69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%