2019
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1518501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel LHC collimator materials: High-energy Hadron beam impact tests and nondestructive postirradiation examination

Abstract: The LHC collimation system must adopt materials with excellent thermal shock resistance, high electrical conductivity, geometrical stability, and radiation hardness. Two novel composites, Molybdenum-Carbide-Graphite and Copper-Diamond, are proposed for the LHC collimation upgrade. A postirradiation examination was performed to assess the status of the composites, tested under intense proton beam impacts at the CERN HiRadMat facility. Metrology measurements, computed tomography, and 3D topography allowed to eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results confirmed the precision of the numerical results when the material models match reasonably well the extreme conditions induced by particle beam impacts [15,16]. In 2015, the HRMT23 (also named "Jaws") [17] experiment validated the design of the jaws made of novel metal-diamond and ceramic-graphite composites designed for HL-LHC collimators, achieving energy densities exceeding those expected for HL-LHC. In 2017, the HRMT21 experiment saw the testing of a low-impedance secondary collimator featuring a faceted rotatable jaw [18], made of a dispersion-strengthened copper, with 20 collimating surfaces to be successively used in case of beam damage.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results confirmed the precision of the numerical results when the material models match reasonably well the extreme conditions induced by particle beam impacts [15,16]. In 2015, the HRMT23 (also named "Jaws") [17] experiment validated the design of the jaws made of novel metal-diamond and ceramic-graphite composites designed for HL-LHC collimators, achieving energy densities exceeding those expected for HL-LHC. In 2017, the HRMT21 experiment saw the testing of a low-impedance secondary collimator featuring a faceted rotatable jaw [18], made of a dispersion-strengthened copper, with 20 collimating surfaces to be successively used in case of beam damage.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This second scenario entails less energy on the target than the BIE. In Table 5, the parameters of the HL-LHC accidental scenarios and those of another experiment, HRMT23 [17], are reported. The HL-LHC scenarios leads to the most intense peaks of energy density U max in bare materials, while with grazing pulses, with a smaller σ of 0.25 mm, even higher U max values were achieved in MultiMat.…”
Section: Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reviews of recent developments that are already being implemented for the upgrade of the LHC can be found in [236]. Promising results were achieved recently that identified valid solutions for a new generation of secondary collimators for the HL-LHC made of a novel Molybdenum-Graphite composite [274], possibly Mo-coated, as well as for metallic composites suitable for tertiary collimators, but about 15 times more robust against beam impact than the tungsten alloy used presently at the LHC [275,276] (Fig. 8.90).…”
Section: Choice Of Collimator Jaw Materials and Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the large variations in density, the sensitivity to micro-and mesostructure, and the brittleness of graphite make numerical simulations unreliable for the identification of failure limits. In this context, irradiation experiments were already conducted to assess the performance of implicit and explicit numerical models with respect to prototype BIDs [11,12]. But, catastrophic failure of graphite materials by beam-induced dynamic mechanical loads has yet to be observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%