2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel method for determining the lower producing limits of pore-throat radius and permeability in tight oil reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The macroscopic seepage capacity of the reservoir is strongly influenced by the microscopic pore structure and the throat of tight sandstone reservoirs. The pore size determines the ability of the rock to store oil and gas, and the radius and shape of the throat determine the seepage capacity of oil and gas [43][44][45]. For a given pressure difference, the smaller the throat radius, the higher the capillary pressure, and the greater the resistance to the flow of oil and gas, and the flow rate of oil and gas will be smaller.…”
Section: Minimum Flow-pore-throat Radius-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macroscopic seepage capacity of the reservoir is strongly influenced by the microscopic pore structure and the throat of tight sandstone reservoirs. The pore size determines the ability of the rock to store oil and gas, and the radius and shape of the throat determine the seepage capacity of oil and gas [43][44][45]. For a given pressure difference, the smaller the throat radius, the higher the capillary pressure, and the greater the resistance to the flow of oil and gas, and the flow rate of oil and gas will be smaller.…”
Section: Minimum Flow-pore-throat Radius-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower limit of the average immovable fluid pore radius in the imbibition process (10 nm) is smaller than that in the displacement process (40 nm). Xiao et al 47 determined the lower limit of the pore throat radius by calculating the thickness of the combined water film of the reservoir. The result is that the lower limit of the producing radius of the Daqing tight reservoir is about 22 nm, while the lower limit of the producing radius of the Changqing tight reservoir is 18 nm, which is consistent with our results.…”
Section: Oil Absorption and Water Drainage And Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the primary energy source worldwide relies mainly on fossil energy, especially in China, where fossil energy accounts for only about 15% of primary energy consumption. In the future economic and industrial development, fossil energy will continue to play a crucial role. Shale gas is an important unconventional natural gas, with China’s shale gas reserves reaching nearly 30 trillion cubic meters, ranking first in the world and being very abundant. However, the low porosity and permeability of China’s shale gas reservoirs have led to significant development challenges, becoming a key constraint on increasing shale gas production in the country. , Therefore, a certain degree of reservoir stimulation is necessary to promote the high-yield and efficient development of shale gas. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%