2021
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1943113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel natural inhibitors targeting B-RAF(V600E) by computational study

Abstract: The aim of this research was to screen the ZINC15 database to select lead compounds and drug candidates which can inhibit B-RAF (V600E). In order to identify drugs potentially inhibited B-RAF (V600E), numerous modules of Discovery Studio 4.5 were employed. Structure-based screening using LibDock was carried out followed by ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) and toxicity prediction. CDOCKER was performed to demonstrate the binding affinity and mechanism between ligands and B-RAF(V600E). To e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Smart Minimizer algorithm and CHARMM force field were performed for ligand minimization. After minimization, all ligand poses were ranked based on the ligands score [ 43 ]. Of note, since the LibDock score is essentially a measure of strength of binding affinity but not binding energy between the ligand substrate and receptor protein, it is a positive, rather than a negative, value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Smart Minimizer algorithm and CHARMM force field were performed for ligand minimization. After minimization, all ligand poses were ranked based on the ligands score [ 43 ]. Of note, since the LibDock score is essentially a measure of strength of binding affinity but not binding energy between the ligand substrate and receptor protein, it is a positive, rather than a negative, value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76 For molecular docking, a flexible docking protocol (the conformation of both ligands and active sites of receptor were flexible), instead of the CDocker protocol (the conformation of ligands was flexible, but the active sites of receptor were rigid), was used to explore the best position of receptor−ligand pair with highest Libdock score. Compared to CDocker Energy and CDocker Interaction Energy that separately provides the binding affinity of the compounds in active sites and nonbonded interactions within the binding site of the active sites, 77 Libdock score was suitable for evaluating the overall binding affinity between molecule and receptor for it represents the degree of energy optimization and stability of the molecular conformation to the receptor, 78 and it was then applied as an evaluation criteria in our study.…”
Section: Chemicals and Reagents All 88 Reference Pfas Standards (Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…67 Since the solubility of salifungin affected the LD 50 calculation of salifungin, the toxicity and other properties of salifungin were further calculated using the TOPKAT module of Discovery Studio 4.5 (BIOVIA, California, USA). 68 The establishment of a mouse acute peritonitis model was conducted based on previous reports. In brief, S. aureus USA300 in the logarithmic growth phase were collected and washed three times with PBS buffer.…”
Section: Acs Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%