2010 IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iccs.2010.5686663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel noise reduction algorithm for LS channel estimation in OFDM system with frequency selective channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean squared error is given by: β -------- (22) Here total number of symbols sent is 64000, in which 64 are the subcarriers included and 1000 are the OFDM symbols. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean squared error is given by: β -------- (22) Here total number of symbols sent is 64000, in which 64 are the subcarriers included and 1000 are the OFDM symbols. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guard time removes ICI (inter carrier interference). The transmitted signal x(n) is passed through a [22] channel with additive noise. The channel is frequency selective time varying fading channel.…”
Section: Figure 3 -Ofdm In Block Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the MSE decreases dramatically with the increase of SNRs when the regularization parameter is improved by introducing the noise effect. The reason is that when noise level decreases the regularization parameter should decrease in order to improve the accuracy of channel To test the performance of the proposed algorithm, the MSE of LS [6], OMP [11] and the proposed estimation algorithm are compared under two different channel conditions and averaged over 2000 Monte Carlo iterations for each SNR in Figure 4 and Figure5. The SNR variation ranges from 5 to 35dB.…”
Section: Improved Sparsa Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these algorithms [7][8][9][10][11][12] are sensitive to the choice of the stopping rules. And in some multipath scenarios, these algorithms may result in significant performance degradation, which are even worse than LS algorithm [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation