2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00326-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel-object place conditioning: behavioral and dopaminergic processes in expression of novelty reward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
85
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, one would expect more exploratory behavior with increasing relative novelty (Bardo et al, 1993), yet there were no group differences in crossovers on the test day. Second, previous research demonstrates that rats still process environmental features while interacting with novel objects that are present during conditioning (Bevins et al, 2002). Third, rats in the present study were given three days of access to the entire apparatus in the absence of a playmate prior to conditioning, and therefore, exposure to the initially non-preferred compartment on test day without a playmate was not an entirely novel experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, one would expect more exploratory behavior with increasing relative novelty (Bardo et al, 1993), yet there were no group differences in crossovers on the test day. Second, previous research demonstrates that rats still process environmental features while interacting with novel objects that are present during conditioning (Bevins et al, 2002). Third, rats in the present study were given three days of access to the entire apparatus in the absence of a playmate prior to conditioning, and therefore, exposure to the initially non-preferred compartment on test day without a playmate was not an entirely novel experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…First, relative novelty affects preference behavior in favor of spending time in the more novel side (Bardo & Bevins, 2000;Bardo et al, 1993;Bardo et al, 1996;Bevins et al, 2002;Carr et al, 1989). Thus, it is possible that social interaction in the playmatepaired compartment may have interfered with the processes that render that context familiar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, open field behavior is affected by processes other than exploratory drive, and factor analysis has long suggested that central square entry appears to be most effected by anxiety (Whimbey and Denenberg, 1967, Denenberg, 1969). In contrast, while exploration of a novel object is affected by anxiety state, it appears to be more significantly impacted by changes in exploratory drive and novelty seeking (Crawley, 1985, Bevins and Bardo, 1999, Bevins et al, 2002. Thus, novel object exploration would seem to be a more sensitive measure of exploratory drive than center entry in the open field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Of particular note, conditioning sessions with cocaine typically last 20 or 30 minutes (Brabant, Quertemont, & Tirelli, 2005;Itzhak & Martin, 2002;Kosten & Miserendino, 1998;Mueller & Stewart 2000;Zavala, Weber, Rice, Alleweireldt, & Neisewander, 2003). In contrast, novelty conditioning sessions are typically 10 or 15 minutes given the transient nature of a novel stimulus (Besheer, Jensen, & Bevins, 2002;Bevins & Bardo, 1999;Bevins et al, 2002;Douglas, Varlinskaya, & Spear, 2003). As such, we used 30-min cocaine conditioning sessions in the first phase and 10-min novelty conditioning sessions in the second experimental phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned previously, the behavioral and neurobiological processes underlying the pleasurable aspects of novelty appear to overlap with those of other rewards (Bardo, Donohew, & Harrington, 1996;Bardo & Dwoskin, 2004;Bevins, 2001;Bevins & Bardo, 1999;Bevins et al, 2002;Cain, Saucier, & Bardo, 2005;Dellu et al, 1996;Rebec et al, 1996). In a place conditioning preparation, conditioned responding is expressed similarly to cocaine and novel objects (Besheer & Bevins, 2003;Bevins, 2001;Bevins & Bardo, 1999;Douglas, Varlinskaya, & Spear, 2003;McBride et al, 1999;Mueller & Stewart, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%