2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.04.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel open-cell bulk metallic glass foams with promising characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bulk scaffolds with various porosities ranging from 2.0% to 72.4% were designed by mixing the Al spacer particles and the TiZr-based matrix powder with different volume fractions. Based on the results obtained using hot pressing in our previous studies [14][15][16], the stress, temperature, and holding time were set to 300 MPa, 520 • C (temperature within the supercooled liquid region), and 300 s, respectively. Then, the Al spacer particles were removed from the prepared scaffolds in a 2 M NaOH warm solution (approximately 70 • C).…”
Section: Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bulk scaffolds with various porosities ranging from 2.0% to 72.4% were designed by mixing the Al spacer particles and the TiZr-based matrix powder with different volume fractions. Based on the results obtained using hot pressing in our previous studies [14][15][16], the stress, temperature, and holding time were set to 300 MPa, 520 • C (temperature within the supercooled liquid region), and 300 s, respectively. Then, the Al spacer particles were removed from the prepared scaffolds in a 2 M NaOH warm solution (approximately 70 • C).…”
Section: Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desired Young's modulus and compressive strength of the porous materials have been approximately predicted using the Gibson and Ashby model [14,15,30], in which the mechanical properties of the porous sample are related to its real porosity (or relative density). The relationships between Young's modulus and relative density, and between compressive strength and relative density are presented by Equations (4) and (5), respectively, = 1( )…”
Section: Predicting Young's Modulus and Compressive Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of metallic-based porous foams, these values are favorable because they are higher than those of most polymers or ceramic foams. [21] The measured data on the modulus and hardness of nanoporous Ag foams can be assessed using the Gibson and Ashby equation [22][23][24] :…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2]. Since it is not easy to measure the tensile or compression strength from the current foams, we can replace the yield strength by the hardness H. Empirically, the fitting values based on the model and experimental data yield n1~2, n2~1.5, C1~1, and C2~0.3 for open cell porous metals, [22][23][24] thus, the Gibson and Ashby equation can be modified as follows:…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%