2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel propane-free mixed refrigerant integrated with nitrogen expansion natural gas liquefaction process for offshore units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[-100, 100] 0 20,20] 0 According to the test results, in the application of f1(x), f2(x), and f5(x), the performance of EHR-GWO-GA is better than that of GA in terms of the accuracy of the optimal solution and the convergence speed. In the application of f3(x), f4(x), and f6(x), EHR-GWO-GA avoids the problem of locally optimal solutions in the process of using GA.…”
Section: Test Function Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[-100, 100] 0 20,20] 0 According to the test results, in the application of f1(x), f2(x), and f5(x), the performance of EHR-GWO-GA is better than that of GA in terms of the accuracy of the optimal solution and the convergence speed. In the application of f3(x), f4(x), and f6(x), EHR-GWO-GA avoids the problem of locally optimal solutions in the process of using GA.…”
Section: Test Function Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this paper continues to use the single-objective optimization method. Jin et al [20] proposed a novel liquefaction process that integrates propane-free mixed refrigerant and nitrogen expander cycles (MR-N2) and the unit energy consumption as the objective using GA to find the optimal decision variables. Li et al [21] studied an improved refrigeration system and optimized it using GA with specific energy consumption as the objective, followed by exergy and energy analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this, the natural gas passes a single step of expansion to low pressure, and this provides the cooling effect that is needed for liquefaction [34]. Expander operations are simple, dependable, and run readily, without hazards connected with flammable work-ing fluids; however, there is a disadvantage as nitrogen expander methods have lower energy efficiency than other liquefaction methods [35]. The International Gas Union (IGU) reported that global LNG trade has seen a low increase of 1.4 MT from 2019 to 356.1 MT in 2020.…”
Section: Natural Gas Liquefactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results demonstrated that the consideration of exergy within optimization yielded better results, with 7.1% less energy consumption, 9.5% less exergy destruction, and exergy efficiency 4.4% higher. Jin et al [15] discussed a liquefaction process that used propane-free mixed refrigerant and nitrogen expander cycles, with an increase of 27.15% in liquefaction efficiency and an increase of 14.92% in exergy efficiency, in comparison with the baseline. In exergoeconomic assessments, the relative cost difference is a parameter that identifies the potential of improvement of each component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%