2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel sol–gel hybrid methyltrimethoxysilane–tetraethoxysilane as solid phase extraction sorbent for organophosphorus pesticides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…111 The hydrophilic silanol groups at the surface of the silica are generally coupled to hydrophobic alkyl or aryl functional groups by reaction with silanes, with C8 and C18 being some of the most widely used coatings. 112, 113 The use of monolithic columns is increasing because they can be prepared easily on-chip by UV polymerization without the need to form retaining structures like frits. 114, 115 In addition, the porosity and surface area of monoliths can be tuned by varying the monomer/porogen composition.…”
Section: Functions In Lab-on-a-chip Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…111 The hydrophilic silanol groups at the surface of the silica are generally coupled to hydrophobic alkyl or aryl functional groups by reaction with silanes, with C8 and C18 being some of the most widely used coatings. 112, 113 The use of monolithic columns is increasing because they can be prepared easily on-chip by UV polymerization without the need to form retaining structures like frits. 114, 115 In addition, the porosity and surface area of monoliths can be tuned by varying the monomer/porogen composition.…”
Section: Functions In Lab-on-a-chip Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the performance of the proposed MSPE method, MNPs/TEOS-CNPrTEOS as adsorbent was compared with some other recently reported methods [15,[23][24][25][29][30][31]. As it is obvious in Supporting Information Table S1, the proposed method offers 2500, 500, 70, and 65 times lower LODs compared with Ti-CNPrTEOS, PDMS-CNPrTEOS, Carbograph, and SiO 2 /C 3 -CN, respectively, which were reported in other studies.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The comparisons of the LOD, RSD and extraction recovery of the presented preconcentration procedure were comparable and even better than those of the previously reported methods. The sensitivity of the proposed method was higher than some of the other sorbent such as C 18, RDSE and RP‐C 18 (Ballesteros & Parrado, ; Giordano, Richter, & Ahumada, ; Ibrahim, Veloo, & Sanagi, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%