2021
DOI: 10.1177/02637758211041120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nowhere land: The evicted space of Black tenants’ rights in Montreal

Abstract: Property relations in 1980s Montreal were a venue of struggle and change. In this period, a well-organized tenants’ movement and the election of progressive governments spawned a series of legal and policy changes that strengthened tenants’ rights in the city. During the same period, however, an emerging police, government and media discourse cast Black communities as criminal ‘ghettos’, and a variety of mechanisms, including new policies meant to protect tenants’ rights, were used to evict criminalized Black … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All papers in this special issue address property’s internal (and sometimes internally contradictory) racial logics, demonstrating how these logics hinge, implicitly or explicitly, on the refusal to grant humanity and personhood to certain subjects. For instance, Ted Rutland (2022) draws on Black humanist scholars Sylvia Wynter (2003), Katherine McKittrick (2006), and Françoise Vergès (2006) to identify how, well beyond the end of slavery, new rubrics of criminalization devised by French Canadian settlers were directed at Black tenants in Montreal. The tenant, Rutland concludes, is never just a tenant but is also a “racial subject.” As white Quebecois’ tenant rights were strengthened through ostensibly progressive pro-tenant policies throughout the 1970s–1990s, so too did Black Quebecois’ evictions, arrests, and ghettoization (and associated negative media images and discourses in the mainstream) heighten.…”
Section: Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All papers in this special issue address property’s internal (and sometimes internally contradictory) racial logics, demonstrating how these logics hinge, implicitly or explicitly, on the refusal to grant humanity and personhood to certain subjects. For instance, Ted Rutland (2022) draws on Black humanist scholars Sylvia Wynter (2003), Katherine McKittrick (2006), and Françoise Vergès (2006) to identify how, well beyond the end of slavery, new rubrics of criminalization devised by French Canadian settlers were directed at Black tenants in Montreal. The tenant, Rutland concludes, is never just a tenant but is also a “racial subject.” As white Quebecois’ tenant rights were strengthened through ostensibly progressive pro-tenant policies throughout the 1970s–1990s, so too did Black Quebecois’ evictions, arrests, and ghettoization (and associated negative media images and discourses in the mainstream) heighten.…”
Section: Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%