2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.87.044304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear asymmetry energy and isovector stiffness within the effective surface approximation

Abstract: The isoscalar and isovector particle densities in the effective surface approximation to the average binding energy are used to derive analytical expressions of the surface symmetry energy, the neutron skin thickness and the isovector stiffness of sharp edged proton-neutron asymmetric nuclei. For most Skyrme forces the isovector coefficients of the surface energy and of the stiffness are significantly different from the empirical values derived in the liquid drop model. Using the analytical isovector surface e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
193
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
10
193
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example is offered by Ref. [64] which expresses the IVGDR energy constant in terms of symmetry energy, saturation density and surface stiffness coefficient, Q sti f f , as,…”
Section: B Correlations Between Nuclear Observables and Parameters Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is offered by Ref. [64] which expresses the IVGDR energy constant in terms of symmetry energy, saturation density and surface stiffness coefficient, Q sti f f , as,…”
Section: B Correlations Between Nuclear Observables and Parameters Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually there is a variety of neutron star properties which are sensitive to SE, that is the maximum mass value and the corresponding radius, the onset of the direct Urca process, the crust-core transition density and pressure e.t.c. [2,9] Recently, there is an extended theoretical [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,57,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These constants are proportional to the corresponding surface tension coefficients σ ± = b (±) S /(4πr 2 0 ) through the solutions (28) and (32) for ρ ± (ξ), which can be taken into account in leading order of a/R (Appendix A) . These coefficients σ ± are the same as found in the expressions for capillary pressures of the macroscopic boundary conditions; see Appendix A2, and [34,35,51,52] with new values ε ± modified by L and K − derivative corrections of (23) and (26), also [54,55]). Within the improved ES approximation where higher order corrections in the small parameter a/R are taken into account, we derived in [52] equations for the nuclear surface itself (see also [34,35,51]).…”
Section: Isovector Energy and Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These coefficients σ ± are the same as found in the expressions for capillary pressures of the macroscopic boundary conditions; see Appendix A2, and [34,35,51,52] with new values ε ± modified by L and K − derivative corrections of (23) and (26), also [54,55]). Within the improved ES approximation where higher order corrections in the small parameter a/R are taken into account, we derived in [52] equations for the nuclear surface itself (see also [34,35,51]). For more exact isoscalar and isovector particle densities we account for the main terms at next order of the parameter a/R in the Lagrange equations [see (A.1) for the isovector and [34,35,51] for the isoscalar case].…”
Section: Isovector Energy and Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation