1974
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.33.383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear-Coulomb Interference in Inelastic Scattering ofαParticles fromEr168,et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even considering the uncertainties, they are relatively small as compared to the corresponding β C values. This behavior is also observed in the 110 Pd (α, α ) [13] data analysis and others [22] but has not been detected in the nearly spherical 58 Ni region, where β N ≈ β C , as expected.…”
Section: B Coupled-channel Data Analysis For the 18 O+ 110 Pd Systemsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Even considering the uncertainties, they are relatively small as compared to the corresponding β C values. This behavior is also observed in the 110 Pd (α, α ) [13] data analysis and others [22] but has not been detected in the nearly spherical 58 Ni region, where β N ≈ β C , as expected.…”
Section: B Coupled-channel Data Analysis For the 18 O+ 110 Pd Systemsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Only in the W isotopes does it seem certain that the observed E0 strength is consistently an order of magnitude smaller than the calculated value. It is known that these nuclei are in a region of hexadecapole deformation [55] and this may offer a qualitative explanation of the suppression of the E0 strength, as argued in the next section.…”
Section: Electric Monopole Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…5 The Coulomb-excitation matrix elements and deformation parameters (Table I) used in the analysis, which included only the 0 + and 2 + members of the GSB, were taken from the literature. 6 In order to compare our results to previous low-resolution experiments, the GSB differential cross sections were added, resulting in the familiar Fresnel shape even for the 18 0 + 184 W case. We obtained optical-model parameters (Table I) by fitting this sum in a standard optical-model calculation.…”
Section: Wmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The optical-model parameters refer to real and imaginary Woods-Saxon wells \\2) and (3 N R were taken from Ref 6,. and the rotational model was used to calculate the static quadrupole moment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%