1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3752(81)80054-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 125

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the way, with the wave cross-section a~t = 2.85.10-19cm 2 for Sn-ll9me one gets from (1), (6) etc. the theoretical result e = 0.01% which contradicts the experimental value (73).…”
Section: -Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By the way, with the wave cross-section a~t = 2.85.10-19cm 2 for Sn-ll9me one gets from (1), (6) etc. the theoretical result e = 0.01% which contradicts the experimental value (73).…”
Section: -Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(7) and (25)). This experimental fact cannot be understood in the framework of the non-collective model based on (1), (6), (18)- (20), (26)-(38).…”
Section: -Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values were determined in these works with relatively large uncertainties (2.2%, 10.2% and 8.7%, respectively) and furthermore, the data of [16] is available only in an unpublished thesis and the work of [14] provides only very limited experimental information. In the compilations before 1981 [17] the weighted average (45.2 ± 1 min) of the half-lives was given as the recommended value. However, this was changed -without any detailed explanation -in the compilations issued after 1993 [18] and the unweighted average of the three measurements [14,15,16] (46.7 min) was given.…”
Section: Available Half-life Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%