1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3752(82)80054-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear data sheets for A = 232,236

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the large sample thickness, the a peaks were broad at the lower-energy side and consequently the two a peaks could not be completely resolved. However, our present data are in agreement with reported values (Schmorak 1982).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Owing to the large sample thickness, the a peaks were broad at the lower-energy side and consequently the two a peaks could not be completely resolved. However, our present data are in agreement with reported values (Schmorak 1982).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In a3zU and 23~U the ground-state rotational bands are known to high spins, and the K~= Obands are established up to the 3-and 5-levels, respectively [4,7,8]. In addition, the a3:Th(~, 2n)Za*U reaction was recently studied by Venema et al [9], who observe the E0 transitions from the fl-vibrational band to the ground-state band.…”
Section: Measurements In 232u and 23~umentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The ground-state and K~=0 -bands in 236U were previously studied up to high spins in radioactivity and Coulomb excitation measurements [7,10]. The excited states of the K~=0 -band are reported to decay predominantly by intraband E2 transitions.…”
Section: Measurements In 236umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute coincidence efficiency was derived from pure Coulomb excitation data, obtained by bombarding the 232Th target with 413 MeV 9~ projectiles. The accuracy of this calibration is mainly limited by the precision of the matrix elements [16] entering the Coulomb excitation calculations, which were performed employing the semiclassical Winther-de Boer code [17]. The absolute uncertainty of the calculated yields of the yrast transitions used (U=4 + ... 14 +) was estimated to be <20%.…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Data Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%