1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00122931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear DNA variation in Tephrosia

Abstract: 2C nuclear DNA amounts and chromatin areas were estimated in twenty diploid and tetraploid (2n = 22, 44; x= 11) species of the genus Tephrosia. There were significant differences between the species both in DNA content and chromatin area. The divergence and evolution of Tephrosia species was accompanied by large scale quantitative DNA variation, ranging from 1.3 picograms in T. strigosa to 7.4 in T. pumila, and the DNA amount varied independently of the chromosome number. The element of discontinuity in the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genome sizes are normally distributed within species (both in terms of measurements (nuclei) and DNA values of individuals within populations), and continuously distributed across species. As noted by Gold & Amemiya (1987), this pattern of continuous genome size change appears to typify many animal groups (Bachmann et al 1972(Bachmann et al , 1985Bianchi et al 1983;Johnson et al 1987) and differs markedly from the discontinuously distributed species DNA values found in many plant groups (Narayan, 1983;Cavalier-Smith, 19856;Sims & Price, 1985;Raina et al 1986;Labani & Elkington, 1987). In the latter, many species or species-groups are differentiated by quantum differences in genome size which is not attributable to polyploidy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Genome sizes are normally distributed within species (both in terms of measurements (nuclei) and DNA values of individuals within populations), and continuously distributed across species. As noted by Gold & Amemiya (1987), this pattern of continuous genome size change appears to typify many animal groups (Bachmann et al 1972(Bachmann et al , 1985Bianchi et al 1983;Johnson et al 1987) and differs markedly from the discontinuously distributed species DNA values found in many plant groups (Narayan, 1983;Cavalier-Smith, 19856;Sims & Price, 1985;Raina et al 1986;Labani & Elkington, 1987). In the latter, many species or species-groups are differentiated by quantum differences in genome size which is not attributable to polyploidy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The phenomenon of discontinuous variation of DNA amounts, surprisingly following a consistent pattern, suggests that only certain quanta of DNA are tolerable in terms of fitness and survival, and the perusal of earlier literature shows that such a series of 'quantum jumps' in DNA is not uncommon. It has been reported in a number of other genera (Rothfels et aZ, 1966;Narayan & Rees, 1976;Narayan, 1982;Sparrow & Nauman, 1973;Raina et al, 1986) and the group means, as in Vicia, occur at the intervals of approximately 2 pg in Clarkia and Nicotiana, and of approximately 1 in Tephrosia and 4 in Allium and Lathyrus. There is evidence, therefore, to suggest that divergence and evolution of species is not only accompanied by DNA variation and change in the composition of DNA but also by a rigid constraint, leading to constant increment in DNA amounts between DNA groups.…”
Section: Discontinuous Dna Variation Nuclear Chromatin Area and Dna mentioning
confidence: 98%