2002
DOI: 10.1088/0253-6102/38/1/59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Effect Study Under K Factor's Nonconstancy

Abstract: A consistent approach to estimating nuclear e ect functions R A v (x 2 ) and R A s (x 2 ) based on numerical iteration technique is presented in the quark-parton model when taking into account the nonconstancy of quantum chromodynamics correction factor K. R A v (x 2 ) and R A s (x 2 ) correspond respectively to the valence quark distributions for one bo u n dnucleon within the nucleus and to the sea quark ones. Related numerical analysis is given for nuclei 12 6 C, 40 20 Ca, and 56 26 Fe. As the basis, it ado… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And some scientists found that the reaction cross section is easier to measure when they use a nucleus struck another nucleus (A-A collision). [4] Nuclear effect to reaction cross section cannot be neglected in A-A collision Drell-Yan process. Nuclear shadowing effect and nucleon Fermi movement effect have been taken into account, but nuclear binding energy is often neglected as a small value when calculating reaction cross section by a lot of people because it is too small compared with collision energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And some scientists found that the reaction cross section is easier to measure when they use a nucleus struck another nucleus (A-A collision). [4] Nuclear effect to reaction cross section cannot be neglected in A-A collision Drell-Yan process. Nuclear shadowing effect and nucleon Fermi movement effect have been taken into account, but nuclear binding energy is often neglected as a small value when calculating reaction cross section by a lot of people because it is too small compared with collision energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%