1967
DOI: 10.3367/ufnr.0092.196708c.0621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear fission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35) due to decrease ofboth g and E , (Fig. 36) [67,35]. Such a behaviour of Q ( x ) was observed earlier in n-Ge [2, 31 and p-Si [4].…”
Section: Hopping Conduction In P-insb Under Uniaxial Pressuresupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35) due to decrease ofboth g and E , (Fig. 36) [67,35]. Such a behaviour of Q ( x ) was observed earlier in n-Ge [2, 31 and p-Si [4].…”
Section: Hopping Conduction In P-insb Under Uniaxial Pressuresupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Obukhov [72,67,69] observed unusual magnetic field dependences of resistivity in deformed p-InSb. Such behaviour, viz.…”
Section: Gigantic Negative Magnetoresistance In Uniaxially Stressed Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"sharp"? This question is of enormous conceptual importance in the theory of turbulence, since the energy dissipation rate is the central object in classical turbulence theories [1][2][3][4][5], and its behavior at high Reynolds numbers may reveal whether there are intermittency corrections to classical scaling [6,7]. Since full numerical simulations of shear flows with Reynolds numbers of the order of 10 6 or above are out of reach, and will remain so in the foreseeable future, rigorous estimates of the dissipation rate derived directly from the Navier-Stokes equations are one of the few tools left to the theorist for approaching such questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact nature of these geostrophic adjustment processes is not known. Cahn (1945) and Obukhov (1949) suggested that the phasevelocity dispersion of gravity waves of different wavelength could account for the quick dissipation of the initial wave-packet. This does not explain, however, the net decrease of gravity wave oscillation energy in a closed system.…”
Section: Geostrophic Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%