2011
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2011.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear organization in genome stability: SUMO connections

Abstract: Recent findings show that chromatin dynamics and nuclear organization are not only important for gene regulation and DNA replication, but also for the maintenance of genome stability. In yeast, nuclear pores play a role in the maintenance of genome stability by means of the evolutionarily conserved family of SUMO-targeted Ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs). The yeast Slx5/Slx8 STUbL associates with a class of DNA breaks that are shifted to nuclear pores. Functionally Slx5/Slx8 are needed for telomere maintenance by an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(204 reference statements)
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slx5 and Slx8 function as heterodimers that bind SUMO through one SIM and ubiquitinate the substrate through the RING domain of Slx8. Although the identity of the SUMO-modified substrates has not been established, depletion of either Slx5 or Slx8 leads to accumulation of sumoylated proteins (44), and these STUBLs are required for genome stability in yeast (21). In mammals, over 200 RING-containing proteins have been reported, but the only STUBL characterized so far is RNF4, which contains four SIMs that generate preferential binding to poly-SUMO chains, suggesting that in mammals, STUBLs specifically target poly-SUMOmodified substrates for degradation (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slx5 and Slx8 function as heterodimers that bind SUMO through one SIM and ubiquitinate the substrate through the RING domain of Slx8. Although the identity of the SUMO-modified substrates has not been established, depletion of either Slx5 or Slx8 leads to accumulation of sumoylated proteins (44), and these STUBLs are required for genome stability in yeast (21). In mammals, over 200 RING-containing proteins have been reported, but the only STUBL characterized so far is RNF4, which contains four SIMs that generate preferential binding to poly-SUMO chains, suggesting that in mammals, STUBLs specifically target poly-SUMOmodified substrates for degradation (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to telomeres, persistent DNA damage, abruptly shortened telomeres, and a subset of highly transcribed genes are also found to shift to the nuclear periphery (reviewed in Oza and Peterson 2010;Nagai et al 2011). In these cases, the NPC is clearly involved in the peripheral association, and for DSBs and short telomeres an additional pathway implicating Mps3 was described (Nagai et al 2008;Kalocsay et al 2009; Figure 4 Telomere-tethering mechanisms.…”
Section: Minimal Anchoring Assay and The Validation Of Genetic Screensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one scenario is that sumoylated proteins accumulate at collapsed forks or resected breaks that require Slx5/Slx8 ubiquitylation for proteasomal degradation, or alternatively, desumoylation by Ulp1, to enable appropriate repair. Exactly what the relevant protein may be is at present unknown, although Rad51, Rad52, Pol32, PCNA, and other proteins of the replication machinery are heavily sumoylated upon DNA damage (Melchior 2000;Nagai et al 2011;Cremona et al 2012).…”
Section: Mobility Of Dsbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mammalian cells, UBC9 is the only SUMOylation E2 enzyme, and the E3 ligases are considered to be important for proper activity and target selection (Cubeñas-Potts and Matunis, 2013). Several lines of evidence suggest the involvement of the SUMO modification system in DNA repair (Kalocsay et al, 2009;Galanty et al, 2009;Morris et al, 2009;Nagai et al, 2011;Ulrich, 2012;Jackson and Durocher, 2013). SUMOylation of PCNA inhibits PCNA-dependent DNA repair of lesions induced by UV exposure or methylmethane sulfonate treatment in budding yeast (Hoege et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%