2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.060414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleation of stripe domains in thin ferromagnetic films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This induced magnetic anisotropy can be attributed to the internal stress coupled with non‐zero magnetostriction coefficient and/or from columnar grains separated by nonmagnetic intergrain boundaries. [ 26 ] For films thicker than a critical thickness (≈200 nm), the stress‐induced anisotropy overcomes the shape anisotropy and the PMA becomes visible as Py domains arrange themselves in stripes (as indeed seen in the bottom inset of Figure 2a). For films below the critical thickness, the shape anisotropy masks the effect of the induced uniaxial anisotropy but the latter is expected to be stronger as the stress induced by the substrate tends to relax in thicker films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This induced magnetic anisotropy can be attributed to the internal stress coupled with non‐zero magnetostriction coefficient and/or from columnar grains separated by nonmagnetic intergrain boundaries. [ 26 ] For films thicker than a critical thickness (≈200 nm), the stress‐induced anisotropy overcomes the shape anisotropy and the PMA becomes visible as Py domains arrange themselves in stripes (as indeed seen in the bottom inset of Figure 2a). For films below the critical thickness, the shape anisotropy masks the effect of the induced uniaxial anisotropy but the latter is expected to be stronger as the stress induced by the substrate tends to relax in thicker films.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Typically, within such approaches the magnetostatic interaction associated with the stripe pattern is properly evaluated by taking into account a realistic, although simplified, magnetization profile across the stripes, such as in [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (1D models), and/or across the film thickness, such as in [25,26] (2D models). Alternatively, a numerical micromagnetic calculation can be performed, but the limitation of such an approach is related to the finite size of the film plane [27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject is currently attracting wide interest, thanks to the central role played today by magnetic thin films with PMA in many applications, from memories to logic devices and sensors [52]. Current active research on PMA films and multilayers is focused onto the definition of magnetic phase diagrams into different systems where magnetic stripe and skyrmion or bubble phases compete [30,47,50,[53][54][55][56][57]. Nanoscale magnetic textures are today the focus of a wide area of research, thanks to the possibility of generating and controlling the propagation of domains, bubbles, skyrmions and other kinds of spin textures for realizing, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%