1992
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920615)69:12<2937::aid-cncr2820691212>3.0.co;2-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleolar organizer region enumeration in keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the skin, this is the case for malignant melanomas vs nevocellular (including Spitz) nevi,32 malignant vs benign fibrohistiocytic tumors,33 and SCCs vs keratoacanthomas. 34 The results of the present study did not show a significant difference in AgNOR counts between the two groups of SCCs stud¬ ied, which were otherwise (except for age, a factor that does not seem to influence the metastatic potential of SCC) comparable from the point of view of thickness and Broders' grade. This finding suggests that the in¬ trinsic proliferative potential of SCCs in OGRs is sim¬ ilar to that of control SCCs and is not enhanced by im¬ munosuppression.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In the skin, this is the case for malignant melanomas vs nevocellular (including Spitz) nevi,32 malignant vs benign fibrohistiocytic tumors,33 and SCCs vs keratoacanthomas. 34 The results of the present study did not show a significant difference in AgNOR counts between the two groups of SCCs stud¬ ied, which were otherwise (except for age, a factor that does not seem to influence the metastatic potential of SCC) comparable from the point of view of thickness and Broders' grade. This finding suggests that the in¬ trinsic proliferative potential of SCCs in OGRs is sim¬ ilar to that of control SCCs and is not enhanced by im¬ munosuppression.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The mean count of total AgNOR profi le area was 9.38 ± 0.25 μm 2 in epithelium adjacent to OSCC and 7.88 ± 0.27 μm 2 in normal oral mucosa and these values were in accordance with the results of previous studies. Total AgNOR profi le area showed an increased value because of the increase in number of AgNORs per nucleus in dysplastic cells as observed by Jean Kanitakis [14] , Giberto et al, [15] Sano K et al, [12] and Pifko J et al [16] …”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, AgNOR numbers differed significantly between groups; however, significant overlap between groups rendered AgNOR enumeration not a sufficiently discriminating criterion to be used in individual cases (33). It would be interesting to test the discriminative power of the morphometric parameters examined herein in cases (34) where AgNOR counts do not suffice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%