1969
DOI: 10.2172/4752369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NUCLEON--NUCLEUS OPTICAL MODEL PARAMETERS, A > 40, E < 50 MeV.

Abstract: school of P h y s i c s , ~n i v g r s i t y of Minnesota, ~i n n e a~o l i s , Minnesota 55455Proton-nucleus and neutron-nucleus s t a n d a r d o p t i c a l model parameters a r e g i v e n t h a t r e p r e s e n t , q u i t e w e l l , much of t h e e l a s t i c s c a t t e r i n g d a t a i n t h e range A>40, E < 5 0 MeV. These parameters were determined by f i t t i n g simultaneously a l a r g e sample of t h e a v a i l a b l e p r o t o n d a t a , and independently, a l a r g e sample of t h e a v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account the best agreement between calculations and experimental data [6,9] (see Fig. 5) after the inclusion of the matrix element p 4 , we choose the case of r R = 1.17 fm (this result is in agreement with results [66] obtained from the fitting procedure in scattering, which is r R = 1.17 fm and r c = 1.22 fm). Analyzing the experimental data [11] at E p = 190 MeV, we obtain r R = 1.09 fm for p + 12 C, r R = 1.11 fm for p + 58 Ni, r R = 1.12 fm for p + 107 Ag and r R = 1.08 fm for p + 197 Au.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking into account the best agreement between calculations and experimental data [6,9] (see Fig. 5) after the inclusion of the matrix element p 4 , we choose the case of r R = 1.17 fm (this result is in agreement with results [66] obtained from the fitting procedure in scattering, which is r R = 1.17 fm and r c = 1.22 fm). Analyzing the experimental data [11] at E p = 190 MeV, we obtain r R = 1.09 fm for p + 12 C, r R = 1.11 fm for p + 58 Ni, r R = 1.12 fm for p + 107 Ag and r R = 1.08 fm for p + 197 Au.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We calculate the radial wave functions R l (r) numerically concerning the chosen potential of the interaction between the proton and the spherically symmetric core. For a description of the proton-nucleus interaction we use the potential as V (r) = v c (r) + v N (r) + v so (r) + v l (r), where v c (r), v N (r), v so (r), and v l (r) are Coulomb, nuclear, spin-orbital, and centrifugal components having the form [66] …”
Section: E Inclusion Of Spin States Of the Scattering Protonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the PE and CN mechanisms contribution to the deuteron activation cross sections, the optical model potentials of Koning-Delaroche [21], Daehnick et al [22], Avrigeanu et al [23], and Becchetti-Greenlees [24] for neutrons, protons, deuterons, alpha-particles and tritons have been used. The same optical potentials have been involved in the BU and DR calculations too.…”
Section: Statistical Particle Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, the parameters of optical model potential (OMP) for particle emissions were taken from global OMPs of Koning and Delaroche [12] for neutron and proton, Lohr and Haeberli [13] for deuteron, Becchetti and Greenlees [14] for triton and 3 He, and Mcfadden and Satchler [15] for a-particle, but different OMPs were also used for better evaluation as follows.…”
Section: Optical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%