Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Nuclei in the Cosmos (NIC2016) 2017
DOI: 10.7566/jpscp.14.010605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleosynthesis in Supernovae, Hypernovae/Gamma-ray Bursts and Compact Binary Mergers

Abstract: We present the status and open problems of the astrophysical sites responsible for the nucleosynthesis of Fe-group and heavier elements (with the exception of the s-process). This involves type Ia supernovae with the requirement to have a low Y e -component (for the explanation of 55 Mn), the role of the core collapse supenova explosion mechanism in the composition of the Fe-group (and heavier?) ejecta, the transition between neutron star and black hole remnants as the result of the collapse of massive stars, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 93 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sake of simplicity, a 1D stratified model of the ejecta is assumed and we shall ignore the details of the explosion mechanism in this discussion. The abundances of post-explosion elements are provided by nucleosynthesis studies and hydrodynamic simulation models of the ejecta (Woosley and Weaver 1995;Thielemann et al 1996Thielemann et al , 2011Thielemann 2017;Limongi et al 2000;Rauscher et al 2002). The final yields from these models correspond to a timescale of 6-7 hours from the explosion.…”
Section: Physical Conditions In the Ejectamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of simplicity, a 1D stratified model of the ejecta is assumed and we shall ignore the details of the explosion mechanism in this discussion. The abundances of post-explosion elements are provided by nucleosynthesis studies and hydrodynamic simulation models of the ejecta (Woosley and Weaver 1995;Thielemann et al 1996Thielemann et al , 2011Thielemann 2017;Limongi et al 2000;Rauscher et al 2002). The final yields from these models correspond to a timescale of 6-7 hours from the explosion.…”
Section: Physical Conditions In the Ejectamentioning
confidence: 99%