2002
DOI: 10.1086/323946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleosynthesis of Zinc and Iron Peak Elements in Population III Type II Supernovae: Comparison with Abundances of Very Metal Poor Halo Stars

Abstract: We calculate nucleosynthesis in core collapse explosions of massive Population III stars and compare the results with abundances of metal-poor halo stars to constrain the parameters of Population III supernovae. We focus on iron peak elements, and, in particular, we try to reproduce the large [Zn/Fe] ] D 0.5. The observed trends of the abundance ratios among the M _ ) iron peak elements are better explained with this high-energy ("" hypernova ÏÏ) model than with the simple "" deep ÏÏ mass cut e †ect because… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
637
3
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 540 publications
(664 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
21
637
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Various attempts have been made with standard SN II events (e.g., Woosley & Weaver 1995), zero-metallicity SN II events, including pair-instability SN (e.g., Heger & Woosley 2002), varying the mass-cut (dividing the mass expelled from that falling back onto the remnant) (e.g., Nakamura et al 1999), hypernovae (i.e. very energetic SNe, with E > 10 52 erg) or varying the SN explosion energy (e.g., Nakamura et al 2001;Umeda & Nomoto 2002, 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various attempts have been made with standard SN II events (e.g., Woosley & Weaver 1995), zero-metallicity SN II events, including pair-instability SN (e.g., Heger & Woosley 2002), varying the mass-cut (dividing the mass expelled from that falling back onto the remnant) (e.g., Nakamura et al 1999), hypernovae (i.e. very energetic SNe, with E > 10 52 erg) or varying the SN explosion energy (e.g., Nakamura et al 2001;Umeda & Nomoto 2002, 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both instances, the formation of these even-Z iron peak elements occurs in explosive burning of silicon (Hix & Thielemann 1999;Thielemann et al 2007). The isotope 52 Cr, which constitutes 83.8% of the solar Cr abundance, is formed as radioactive 52 Fe mainly in the incomplete Si-burning region (Umeda & Nomoto 2002, 2005. The dominant isotope of Fe, 56 Fe (91.7% of the solar Fe abundance), is produced as radioactive 56 Ni at very high temperatures, T > 4 × 10 9 K .…”
Section: Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of Fe-peak elements ejected in a SN II primarily depends on the explosion energy and the mass cut between the ejected material and the collapsed core (note that these parameters are related, although they are often treated independently, e.g., Umeda & Nomoto 2002). Less Cr is produced relative to Fe for a deeper mass cut (Nakamura et al 1999;Umeda & Nomoto 2002). Current estimates of the mass cut are based on the mass ejected in the form of 56 Ni and the ratio 58 Ni/ 56 Ni, which are determined from SN II light curves and spectra.…”
Section: Nucleosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The core-collapse SN II yields are adopted from WW95. However, for lower metallicities, we use the results of highexplosion-energy hypernovae (Umeda & Nomoto 2002Nomoto et al 2006Nomoto et al , 2013 because the latter models reproduce the large [Zn/Fe] ratios of halo stars and lowmetallicity Damped Lyman-α systems (see Barbuy et al 2015). At near-solar metallicities, the Zn underproduction problem (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%