2008
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.082354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleotide Polymorphism and Phenotypic Associations Within and Around the phytochrome B2 Locus in European Aspen (Populus tremula, Salicaceae)

Abstract: We investigated the utility of association mapping to dissect the genetic basis of naturally occurring variation in bud phenology in European aspen (Populus tremula). With this aim, we surveyed nucleotide polymorphism in 13 fragments spanning an 80-kb region surrounding the phytochrome B2 (phyB2) locus. Although polymorphism varies substantially across the phyB2 region, we detected no signs for deviations from neutral expectations. We also identified a total of 41 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
157
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
13
157
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of overestimation is thereby a function of the power of the study such that QTL effects will be more upwardly biased with low power, that is, small effect sizes (Xu 2003;Zöllner and Pritchard 2007). Ingvarsson et al (2008) performed a candidate gene association mapping approach in European aspen and identified two singlenucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with bud set. They used an ad hoc method described by Allison et al (2002) to obtain less biased estimates of QTL effects.…”
Section: Predictive Power and Its Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of overestimation is thereby a function of the power of the study such that QTL effects will be more upwardly biased with low power, that is, small effect sizes (Xu 2003;Zöllner and Pritchard 2007). Ingvarsson et al (2008) performed a candidate gene association mapping approach in European aspen and identified two singlenucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with bud set. They used an ad hoc method described by Allison et al (2002) to obtain less biased estimates of QTL effects.…”
Section: Predictive Power and Its Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In balsam poplar, our analyses implicate FRI in the response to local selection at different latitudes, probably reflecting a role of FRI in the temperaturesensitive timing of seasonal development. Because floweringtime homologs in Populus can affect a range of developmental traits, including flowering and bud dormancy (Böhlenius et al 2006;Ingvarsson et al 2008;Lagercrantz 2009;Ma et al 2010), the link between allelic variation in FRI and variation in specific phenotypes in poplar awaits further study.…”
Section: Molecular Adaptation Of Phenology Network Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative research across diverse taxa suggests that this gene network is responsible for variation in multiple phenological traits responsive to photoperiod, including flowering, tuberization, and seasonal dormancy (Lagercrantz 2009). Based upon transgenic and QTL mapping experiments in Populus, genes in this network are also associated with flowering and vegetative bud development in trees (Frewen et al 2000;Chen et al 2002;Böhlenius et al 2006;Ingvarsson et al 2008;Jackson 2009;Ma et al 2010;Rohde et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In forest trees, the candidate gene association study (AS) approach has identified SNPs and genes linked to wood and growth traits in many tree species such as Eucalyptus nitens (Thumma et al ., 2009), Populus spp, (Ingvarsson et al ., 2008; Wegrzyn et al ., 2010; Guerra et al ., 2013), pines (Dillon et al ., 2010; Cumbie et al ., 2011; Jaramillo‐Correa et al ., 2015) and spruces (Beaulieu et al ., 2011; Prunier et al ., 2013). However, the variation in quantitative traits explained by individual SNP markers is generally low and rarely exceeds 5% (Dillon et al ., 2010; Guerra et al ., 2013), consistent with multigenic control (Evans et al ., 2014) and the relatively shallow genomic sampling in most studies to date (< 1% and 10% of estimated gene coding loci per genome) (Nystedt et al ., 2013; Neale et al ., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%