“…Interestingly, the overall diversity was of similar magnitude in their study (p ¼ 6.93 Â 10 À3 ) than in ours (p ¼ 6.15 Â 10 À3 ). These figures are lower than those previously reported on Populus tremula (11.1 Â 10 À3 ) (Ingvarsson, 2005), but higher than in pine species, Pinus taeda (3.98 Â 10 À3 ) (Brown et al, 2004), Pinus pinaster (2.41 Â 10 À3 in Pot et al, 2005;5.51 Â 10 À3 in Eveno et al, 2008) or Pinus sylvestris (1.4 Â 10 À3 ) (Dvornyk et al, 2002), or other conifers (Gonzalez-Martinez et al, 2006;. Larger diversity in broadleaves than in conifers is also observed when the comparative analysis is conducted at the level of silent polymorphism: the level of diversity in oaks (p silent ¼ 11.2 Â 10 À3 ) is higher than earlier reports in pines (p silent ¼ 7.7 Â 10 À3 in P. sylvestris, Wachowiak et al, 2009; p silent ¼ 8.6 Â 10 À3 in P. pinaster, Eveno et al, 2008) Although the number of genes is still low, our results confirm earlier findings obtained with other marker systems, suggesting that oak is highly variable species (Kremer and Petit, 1993;Mariette et al, 2002).…”