2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1902.05405
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Null-homologous unknottings

Abstract: Every knot can be unknotted with two generalized twists; this was first proved by Ohyama.Here we prove that any knot of genus g can be unknotted with 2g null-homologous twists and that there exist genus g knots that cannot be unknotted with fewer than 2g null-homologous twists.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum number of generalized crossings one must add to the unknot to construct a given knot is called its untwisting number, and was first defined in [MD88]. The untwisting number of knots was investigated in [Liv02,CT14,İnc16,İnc17,McC19,McC21,Liv19]. It is straightforward to see that if a knot is obtained from a slice knot by adding m positive generalized crossings, then it is slice in # m CP 2 [CT14, Lemma 2.8].…”
Section: Background and Elementary Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The minimum number of generalized crossings one must add to the unknot to construct a given knot is called its untwisting number, and was first defined in [MD88]. The untwisting number of knots was investigated in [Liv02,CT14,İnc16,İnc17,McC19,McC21,Liv19]. It is straightforward to see that if a knot is obtained from a slice knot by adding m positive generalized crossings, then it is slice in # m CP 2 [CT14, Lemma 2.8].…”
Section: Background and Elementary Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each case, the knot can be changed to a ribbon knot by a negative to positive crossing change, and is therefore H-slice in CP 2 . Now apply Corollary 5.6 and the result of [Liv02,Liv19], that every knot of genus one can be converted to the unknot by two generalized crossing changes (one positive to negative and one negative to positive).…”
Section: Pretzel Knotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to complete the proof we need to show that there are always pairs of null-homologous twisting operations that decrease the algebraic genus. This can be done by adapting the argument used by Livingston to prove that any knot can be converted to the unknot using at most 2g null-homologous twists [Liv19].…”
Section: Decreasing the Algebraic Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will not see any of these surfaces. Rather, we will find a precise upper bound for the topological 4-genus via an operation called null-homologous twisting, which has recently received some attention [6,8,10,11]. A null-homologous twist is an operation on oriented links that inserts a full twist into an even number 2m of parallel strands, m of which point upwards, and m of which point downwards (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%