2011
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2011.110507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NUM-Based Fair Rate-Delay Balancing for Layered Video Multicasting over Adaptive Satellite Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though not exactly the same because of the different deployment under consideration, this policy is analogous to a weighted-round-robin policy is which the weights are determined based on both the rate and the delay requirements. Because our proposal falls into this category of approaches that do not require packet-level information, and to better illustrate the differences with prior works, we provide an intuitive comparison of our resource allocation with two benchmark policies (which we call "R-Round-Robin" and "RD-Round-Robin") that encapsulate the merits of Dutta et al [19] and Pradas and Vazquez-Castro [20], respectively. It is important to note that these policies are stationary because the allocation of the current slot does not depend on, and adapt to, the allocation of previous slots within each slot allocation block.…”
Section: Review Of State-of-the-art In Video Streaming Over Wirelementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though not exactly the same because of the different deployment under consideration, this policy is analogous to a weighted-round-robin policy is which the weights are determined based on both the rate and the delay requirements. Because our proposal falls into this category of approaches that do not require packet-level information, and to better illustrate the differences with prior works, we provide an intuitive comparison of our resource allocation with two benchmark policies (which we call "R-Round-Robin" and "RD-Round-Robin") that encapsulate the merits of Dutta et al [19] and Pradas and Vazquez-Castro [20], respectively. It is important to note that these policies are stationary because the allocation of the current slot does not depend on, and adapt to, the allocation of previous slots within each slot allocation block.…”
Section: Review Of State-of-the-art In Video Streaming Over Wirelementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• (i) round-robin slot assignment ("Round-robin"), which is the most typical option in WPAN MAC designs [1][2] [7][8]; • (ii) rate-proportional round-robin slot assignment ("R-Round-robin") [19], where the average bit-budget of each sensor within each RAB is used to allocate a proportional number of slots in a round-robin fashion (higher budget corresponds to more slots for a sensor); • (iii) rate/delay-proportional round-robin slot assignment ("RD-Round-robin") [20], where, beyond the bit-budget, the delay deadline of each sensor is also used to weight the slot assignment according to a heuristic rule, i.e., beyond rate, the delay deadline is taken into account in the proportional slot allocation. Note that the optimal slot allocation ("Optimal"), i.e.…”
Section: A Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example shows an architecture consisting of a GW and a set of multicast groups MG i spread throughout the coverage. Multicast groups are defined as set of UTs which are under similar channel conditions and request the same type of video content [10]. This example could represent upcoming IPTV services such as Content Delivery Services (CDS) or Live Multimedia Broadcast (LMB).…”
Section: B Nc Based Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the seminal work laid by Kelly [1], network utility maximization (NUM) has emerged as a promising framework in network congestion control protocol design and received wide investigation. Many literatures, for example, [2]- [8], have been published since. There are also books or tutorials on the theory of NUM; for example, [9]- [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we formulate our problem based on the links of a network because they manage how much resource (that is, bandwidth) each end user should obtain, just as in the distribution of wellbeing by governments. However, the fundamental difference of our work is that our algorithm is based on the optimization for each link rather than the global optimization of all users and all links together as done in other existing works [4], [6] and [8]. This allows for a distributed algorithm where each link along a data path can desire a source sending rate, which means that we can design our new scheme with the congestion signal fed back from the most congested link (which results in network-wise and maxmin fairness) instead of the cumulative congestion signal over the flow path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%