2001
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.6.1120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Number and Proliferative Capacity of Osteogenic Stem Cells Are Maintained During Aging and in Patients with Osteoporosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
119
4
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
119
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Stolzing et al (2008) confirmed those already demonstrated in previous studies (D 'Ippolito et al 1999, Mendes et al 2002, Chen et al 2005, Zhang et al 2005, Zheng et al 2007, Kretlow et al 2008, observing a significant age-related change in membrane markers expression levels, an alkaline phosphatase activity, chondrogenic and myogenic differentiation potency decline with donor age in contrast with adipogenic differentiation. However, these data are in contrast with those reported by other research groups (Bergman et al 1996, Stenderup et al 2001, Bellows et al 2003, which showed no age-related differences in differentiation potency. Different results obtained are with regard to the choice of age groups, group size, gender, inclusion of pathological states, isolation and cultivation conditions (Sethe et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Stolzing et al (2008) confirmed those already demonstrated in previous studies (D 'Ippolito et al 1999, Mendes et al 2002, Chen et al 2005, Zhang et al 2005, Zheng et al 2007, Kretlow et al 2008, observing a significant age-related change in membrane markers expression levels, an alkaline phosphatase activity, chondrogenic and myogenic differentiation potency decline with donor age in contrast with adipogenic differentiation. However, these data are in contrast with those reported by other research groups (Bergman et al 1996, Stenderup et al 2001, Bellows et al 2003, which showed no age-related differences in differentiation potency. Different results obtained are with regard to the choice of age groups, group size, gender, inclusion of pathological states, isolation and cultivation conditions (Sethe et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Alkaline phosphatase, which should decline only with differentiation, was found to decrease progressively with the number of passages, while nestin expression was variable in undifferentiated stem cells [2,3]. Furthermore, studies on osteo-genic stem cells [36] and muscle precursor cells [25] indicated that Stro1 is present in rats of all ages. Quantification of the stem cell surface marker Stro1 confirmed that for both MSC and ASC the percentage of Stro1 positive cells was similar for neonates and young adults, but with a decrease in Stro1 positive cells from old animals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are several reports describing the influence of aging on the properties of bone marrow-derived MSCs, and this topic remains controversial. Some studies have shown that aging does not affect colony-forming efficiency (33)(34)(35), adipogenesis (34), and calcification (33,34,36). In contrast, others have reported that aging affects the proliferative capacity at passage 1 (36) as well as the chondrogenic (36), osteogenic (35,37), and adipogenic (36) differentiation ability of bone marrow-derived MSCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%