1985
DOI: 10.1177/0193841x8500900505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numbers and Words

Abstract: This article discusses how quantitative and qualitative methods can be combined in a single evaluation study to better understand the phenomenon in question. Three perspectives on combining methods are reviewed: the purist approach where the two methods are seen as mutually exclusive, the situationalist approach that views them as separate but equal, and the pragmatist approach that suggests integration is possible. From the pragmatist position it is argued that either method can be used at the analysis stage … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 455 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(Johnson, et al, 2007: 123) The researchers used a mixed research method, as it allowed for the corroboration of each quantitative and qualitative method through triangulation (Rossman & Wilson, 1985). The method chosen also enriched the data analysis process (Rossman & Wilson, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Johnson, et al, 2007: 123) The researchers used a mixed research method, as it allowed for the corroboration of each quantitative and qualitative method through triangulation (Rossman & Wilson, 1985). The method chosen also enriched the data analysis process (Rossman & Wilson, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, a qualitative research methodology was used in this study with a questionnaire survey to reinforce the discussions based on quantitative data. Use of different research (Rossman & Wilson, 1991). Two focus group discussions were conducted with the participation of five and six students, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this method is to seek elaboration, enhancement, illustration and clarification of the results from one method with the results from the other method (Greene, Caracelli, & Graham, 1989;Greene & McClintock, 1985;Mark & Shotland, 1987;Rossman & Wilson, 1985). According to Greene, Caracelli, and Graham (1989), the rationale behind this is, "to increase the interpretability, meaningfulness, and validity of constructs and inquiry results by both capitalizing on inherent method strengths and counteracting inherent biases in methods and other sources" (p. 259).…”
Section: Research Approach and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%