2020
DOI: 10.1002/srin.202000067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numeric Simulation of the Steel Flow in a Slab Caster with a Box‐Type Electromagnetic Stirrer

Abstract: The usage of electromagnetic actuators in the continuous steel‐casting process is on a steady rise, due to its possibilities for a sophisticated, contactless flow control. The complexity of the casting process and the ever‐increasing quality demands require a well‐founded knowledge of the interaction between the electromagnetic actuators and the liquid steel flow. Numeric modeling provides a detailed view and is therefore crucial for understanding the interaction between the electromagnetic fields and the liqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, while performing numerical calculations for electromagnetic fields, certain assumptions are made to simplify the calculations while still guaranteeing that the desired results match the necessary criteria as follows [ 13 , 15 ]: Given the ample space surrounding the electromagnetic stirring device, there is assurance that the magnetic field lines can form a closed loop and are not significantly affected by the external magnetic field. Therefore, it is assumed that the magnetic field in the proximity of the magnetic pole is uniformly distributed, with the magnetic field lines passing through the pole oriented at a right angle to the surface of the pole; The physical parameters are time-invariant constants due to the small variation in the physical parameters of the molten steel during the continuous casting process; Considering the magnetic Reynolds number being less than 1 during electromagnetic stirring in the continuous casting process, it is assumed that the electromagnetic field is barely affected by the slow flow of molten steel (0.9 m/min) [ 16 ]; The electromagnetic field generated by electromagnetic stirring can be considered a quasistatic field due to the low frequency of the alternating current (5–9 Hz). …”
Section: Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, while performing numerical calculations for electromagnetic fields, certain assumptions are made to simplify the calculations while still guaranteeing that the desired results match the necessary criteria as follows [ 13 , 15 ]: Given the ample space surrounding the electromagnetic stirring device, there is assurance that the magnetic field lines can form a closed loop and are not significantly affected by the external magnetic field. Therefore, it is assumed that the magnetic field in the proximity of the magnetic pole is uniformly distributed, with the magnetic field lines passing through the pole oriented at a right angle to the surface of the pole; The physical parameters are time-invariant constants due to the small variation in the physical parameters of the molten steel during the continuous casting process; Considering the magnetic Reynolds number being less than 1 during electromagnetic stirring in the continuous casting process, it is assumed that the electromagnetic field is barely affected by the slow flow of molten steel (0.9 m/min) [ 16 ]; The electromagnetic field generated by electromagnetic stirring can be considered a quasistatic field due to the low frequency of the alternating current (5–9 Hz). …”
Section: Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the magnetic Reynolds number being less than 1 during electromagnetic stirring in the continuous casting process, it is assumed that the electromagnetic field is barely affected by the slow flow of molten steel (0.9 m/min) [ 16 ];…”
Section: Model Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) Solutes transport equation [20]: (24) where Sc t represents the Schmidt number, which is set to 1.0 [21]; S d denotes the molecular diffusion source term; S c signifies the convective diffusion source term; D l,i stands for the diffusion coefficient of the solute element in the liquid phase; D s,i represents the diffusion coefficient of the solute element in the solid phase; c i denotes the concentration of the solute element; c l,i is the local average concentration of the solute element in the liquid phase; c s,i is the local average concentration of the solute element in the solid phase; and k i denotes the equilibrium distribution coefficient of element between solid and liquid phases.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic induction causes a melt flow, and its simulation is complicated and needs correct data, like the ω(B, r) function. It is known that obtaining information about the melt flow from industrial casting is impossible, so we must conduct some cold experiments with well-monitored parameters (like Hg, Ga, GaIn, and GaInSn alloys) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Because only very little correctly measured data for the ω(B, r) function can be found in the literature [21][22][23]25,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], any previous simulations of the melt flow induced by an RMF ignored the function to solve the problem mentioned above [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%