2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analyses of liquid slosh by Finite volume and Lattice Boltzmann methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field of fluid mechanics includes numerous partial differential equations (PDEs) essential for studying fluid dynamics. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) uses numerical analysis and data structures to analyze and solve fluid flow problems, incorporating various numerical solving methods such as the finite element method [ 1 ], finite volume method [ 2 ], and spectral methods [ 3 ]. Despite significant advancements over recent decades, these methods often face complexities due to mesh division in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of fluid mechanics includes numerous partial differential equations (PDEs) essential for studying fluid dynamics. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) uses numerical analysis and data structures to analyze and solve fluid flow problems, incorporating various numerical solving methods such as the finite element method [ 1 ], finite volume method [ 2 ], and spectral methods [ 3 ]. Despite significant advancements over recent decades, these methods often face complexities due to mesh division in practical applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ünal et al [15] applied FDM to investigate the liquid sloshing in a closed, partially filled, T-shaped baffled and unbaffled two-dimensional rectangular tank, the results imply that the baffle is fully effective in pressure and wave damping when its height is greater than 80% of the liquid level. Yang et al [16] used combined FVM method and Lattice Boltzmann method to perform the quick evaluation of liquid sloshing behavior under different container designs, the results show that the computational time cost of LBM model is only around 7.0% of the time cost for FVM model without compromise of the numerical accuracy. Cho et al [17] applied BEM to obtain the analytic solution for the sloshing with porous horizontal baffle, two baffle positions at the center and at both walls of a rectangular tank were considered for various porosities, lengths, and submergence depths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In physics and engineering, many important physical models are described as partial differential equations (PDEs), such as Navier–Stokes equations [ 4 ] for fluid mechanics and Maxwell equations [ 5 ] for electromagnetic field theory. When solving partial differential equations using traditional numerical methods, such as the Finite Difference Method (FDM) [ 6 ], Finite Element Method (FEM) [ 7 ], Finite Volume Method (FVM) [ 8 ], Radial Basis Function Method (RBF) [ 9 ], etc., problems such as high computational costs and the curse of dimensionality are often encountered. Over the last few years, the use of machine learning to solve partial differential equations has also rapidly expanded [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%