2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of singly curved shallow composite panels under three-point bend load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Inversion of curved beams under mechanical loading has been studied extensively in the literature. Curved beam deformation behavior due to bending moment has been modelled using analytical [50], finite element [51] and experimental [52] techniques. Owing to their unique geometry, these structures often undergo bifurcation buckling and snap-through instability when the translational and rotational degrees of freedom are constrained at their ends [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversion of curved beams under mechanical loading has been studied extensively in the literature. Curved beam deformation behavior due to bending moment has been modelled using analytical [50], finite element [51] and experimental [52] techniques. Owing to their unique geometry, these structures often undergo bifurcation buckling and snap-through instability when the translational and rotational degrees of freedom are constrained at their ends [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the average span for the 207 and 483 kPa specimen was 32.4 mm (0.81 mm thick) and 30.8 mm (0.77 mm thick), respectively. These half‐ring specimens were placed concave side down on support pins to reduce the effect of geometric nonlinearities . The cross‐head speed was set to 2 mm/min and the half‐ring segments were then loaded until an outer surface rupture occurred.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14]. The support span for all tests was set such that a 16:1 or greater span to depth ratio was maintained and the specimens were placed with the concave side down to reduce the effect of geometric nonlinearities [15]. Twelve ring segment specimens from each of the pressure/ply combinations were tested.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%