2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of tunneling in slates with anisotropic time-dependent behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Zbek et al [4] conducted anisotropy ratio and anisotropy angle studies on the strength of four types of metamorphic rock. In a study by Lee et al [5], the anisotropy ratio and anisotropy angle of slate strength were taken into consideration, and excavation deformations of slate tunnels were successfully simulated. Current anisotropy studies regarding the hydraulic conduction of rock masses are generally focused on rock masses with joint fissures [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zbek et al [4] conducted anisotropy ratio and anisotropy angle studies on the strength of four types of metamorphic rock. In a study by Lee et al [5], the anisotropy ratio and anisotropy angle of slate strength were taken into consideration, and excavation deformations of slate tunnels were successfully simulated. Current anisotropy studies regarding the hydraulic conduction of rock masses are generally focused on rock masses with joint fissures [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental tests show that the time-dependency of geomaterials may exhibit an anisotropic response which may be similar to the elastic anisotropic response Zoback 2013a, b, 2014;Li et al 2019). In some cases, both factors, -anisotropy and time-dependency-, must be taken into account, to estimate properly the actual behaviour of geomaterials, or even more properly represent the response of underground excavations (Dubey and Gairola 2008;Lee et al 2019;Li et al 2019). To simulate the excavation of tunnels in anisotropic time-dependent geomaterials, Manh et al (2015b) and Lee et al (2019) developed an alternative model through coupling the Burgers-creep viscoplastic (CVISC) and the ubiquitous-joint (UBI) models, and implemented this alternative model in FLAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, both factors, -anisotropy and time-dependency-, must be taken into account, to estimate properly the actual behaviour of geomaterials, or even more properly represent the response of underground excavations (Dubey and Gairola 2008;Lee et al 2019;Li et al 2019). To simulate the excavation of tunnels in anisotropic time-dependent geomaterials, Manh et al (2015b) and Lee et al (2019) developed an alternative model through coupling the Burgers-creep viscoplastic (CVISC) and the ubiquitous-joint (UBI) models, and implemented this alternative model in FLAC. Moreover, Weng et al (2010) proposed a shear-induced anisotropic degradation model involving time-dependent behaviour, and their conceptual model is extended based on the Burgers viscoelastic model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field observations have revealed that structural anisotropy causes obvious asymmetric tunnel deformation associated with the orientation of the bedding planes of the surrounding rocks (Meng et al, 2013;Chen et al, 2019;Liu et al, 2021). The deformation often exhibits pronounced time-dependent characteristics when the tunnel is under high geo-stress relative to the strength of the surrounding rocks (Panthi and Shrestha, 2018;Lee et al, 2019). It has been reported that the anisotropic time-dependent deformation of the surrounding rocks has signi cant adverse effects on the long-term structural stability of tunnels and should be considered during the design of the support system (Tian et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%