2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental analysis of jet release and jet flame length for qualitative risk analysis at hydrogen refueling station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al evaluated the overpressure hazard induced by hydrogen explosion in mobile HRSs and predicted the minimum safe distance with different destructive effects in case of hydrogen leakage under free space for mobile HRSs in combination with the TNO multienergy method. They found that the distance with irreversible casualties on human lives was 79.3 m, and the distance with the least impact on buildings and personnel was 313.2 m. Park et al investigated hydrogen jets, jet flames, and thermal radiation from HRSs using hydrogen risk assessment models (HyRAM). They found that fillers, pipeline trailers, and sidewalks were at the highest risk.…”
Section: Hydrogen Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al evaluated the overpressure hazard induced by hydrogen explosion in mobile HRSs and predicted the minimum safe distance with different destructive effects in case of hydrogen leakage under free space for mobile HRSs in combination with the TNO multienergy method. They found that the distance with irreversible casualties on human lives was 79.3 m, and the distance with the least impact on buildings and personnel was 313.2 m. Park et al investigated hydrogen jets, jet flames, and thermal radiation from HRSs using hydrogen risk assessment models (HyRAM). They found that fillers, pipeline trailers, and sidewalks were at the highest risk.…”
Section: Hydrogen Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing state-of-the-art research assesses the risk of hydrogen safety and HVs primarily with theoretical-based approaches utilizing common risk assessment methods such as the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) [25], the bow-tie technique [26], and hazard and operability studies (HAZOP) [27][28][29][30]. For instance, Park et al [31] conducted a study that examined the risk associated with hydrogen refuelling stations (HRSs) using toolkit software [32]. In a related study, a hybrid framework based on a fuzzy fault tree (FT) and HAZOP was used to assess the leakage risk of liquid HRS [33].…”
Section: State Of the Art Review On Hydrogen Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xing et al [22] used HyRAM to analyze the high-risk unit for urban hydrogen refueling stations and determine the fatality zone, flammable area and safe distances. Park et al [23] studied accidents at hydrogen refueling stations and analyzed individual and societal risks using the HyRAM software. HyRAM also incorporates experimentally validated models of releases and flames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%