2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Granular Anchor Piles in Loose Sandy Soil Subjected to Uplift Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A very few field studies have been performed on GAP system in loose cohesionless soils in literature [1,15]. Kranthikumar et al [16] analyzed GAP system in loose cohesionless soils using Plaxis-3D and presented a detailed parametric study for single pile system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very few field studies have been performed on GAP system in loose cohesionless soils in literature [1,15]. Kranthikumar et al [16] analyzed GAP system in loose cohesionless soils using Plaxis-3D and presented a detailed parametric study for single pile system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers [1]- [5] investigated the pullout behavior and found that the pullout forces increased as the surface area of the granular pile anchor increased. Similarly, researchers has investigated the heave behavior [6], heave and pullout [7], heave and shrinkage [8,9] uplift force [10] and found that the granular pile anchor is effective in improving the soil condition. In this paper, study focus to find best depth of granular pile anchor to extend from active zone to stable zone to control the heave and uplift pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the early studies on the GPA system comes from the laboratory investigation carried out by [8]. More recent studies have been conducted on GPA with various parameters to investigate based on geosynthetic pullout load and rate of heave [9,10]; pullout in field-scale [7]; heave in field study [11,12]; heave and uplift [13]; cycles of swelling and shrinkage [14]; geogrid reinforcement on uplift capacity [15]; uplift capacity [16]; relative density of GPA fill material and encasement effects on the pull capacity [17]; comparison between the GPA and helical pile anchors [18]; geosynthetic encasement [19]; and pullout forces [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%